meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Lawfare Podcast

Lawfare Daily: The Dangers of Privatized, Automated Immigration Enforcement

The Lawfare Podcast

The Lawfare Institute

History, Military, International Relations, Government, Constitutional Law, News, International Law, Current Events, Politics, Rule Of Law, Law, Foreign Policy, Diplomacy, National Security, Intelligence, Terrorism

4.7 • 6.4K Ratings

🗓️ 30 April 2026

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Lawfare Managing Editor Tyler McBrien sits down with Chinmayi Sharma, an associate professor at Fordham Law School and a contributing editor at Lawfare, to discuss Sharma’s forthcoming law review article, “Immigration Enforcement Intermediaries.”

They discuss the U.S. federal government’s increasingly privatized and automated system of immigration enforcement—which Sharma describes as “a code-based Leviathan—cloaked in the veneer of legal legitimacy yet operating outside traditional democratic channels”—and how private technology vendors entrench their positions within that system. Sharma also walks through a number of proposals for states and other sub-federal entities to counteract these harms to immigrants, society, and the rule of law itself.

To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Because of the data and technology that these vendors provide, the federal government is getting access to information that it used to rely on states for.

0:13.4

And it is getting access to technology that means that immigration enforcement requires less manpower to do the things that the human labor did

0:23.4

before.

0:24.7

It's the Lawfare podcast.

0:26.8

I'm Tyler McBrion, managing editor of Lawfare, with Cheney Sharma, an associate professor

0:31.9

at Fordham Law School and contributing editor here at Lawfare.

0:36.2

Under the auspices of national security authorities, we've seen kind of this system being used to marginalize communities that have been marginalized under the banner of national security for a long time.

0:51.8

Today we're talking about Cheney's forthcoming law review article, Immigration Enforcement Intermediaries,

0:57.5

and the automation and privatization of U.S. federal immigration architecture.

1:03.3

So Cheney, you have a forthcoming law review paper called Immigration Enforcement Intermediaries.

1:08.9

In it, you describe the current U.S. immigration

1:12.2

enforcement system in a few ways. I'll just name two of them. You call it an automated

1:19.0

ecosystem of interconnected tech platforms. You also call it a code-based Leviathan.

1:25.7

So with those terms in mind, what is the current U.S.

1:31.1

immigration enforcement system that we have? And then briefly, we can get into it more later.

1:35.6

How did we get here? Absolutely. And like, shout out to you guys. I think that the

1:41.8

docu series that you're hosting does a great job of like not just

1:45.8

the tech infrastructure, but like broadly what is happening with the relationship of the government

1:50.9

and the private sector. But I think there's kind of three pillars here, two that are like

1:58.1

the traditional loci of power in immigration enforcement, and that's a federal

2:03.7

government and states. And then the new emerging note of power is private vendors. Private vendors

2:12.2

have been involved for a long time, but their role has fundamentally changed. And it is not because we have

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Lawfare Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Lawfare Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.