meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Kouri Richins Trial: The Forensic Evidence That Could Prove EVERYTHING — Why Isn't Anyone Asking?

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

News, News Commentary, True Crime

3.3912 Ratings

🗓️ 6 February 2026

⏱️ 20 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Kouri Richins murder trial starts February 2026. She's charged with poisoning her husband Eric with a lethal dose of fentanyl, then writing a children's book about grief. The prosecution says she killed him for money. The defense says key witnesses have recanted and the state can't prove she ever had fentanyl in her hands.

But there's one piece of evidence that could answer the most important question in this case — and nobody's publicly demanding it.

Eric Richins' hair.

Hair follicle analysis can detect fentanyl use going back ninety days or longer. More importantly, forensic labs can distinguish between chronic drug use and a single acute exposure. If Eric was secretly using fentanyl for weeks or months before his death, his hair would show it — supporting an accidental overdose theory. If his hair shows no prior exposure, that points directly to poisoning.

The science exists. It's used in criminal cases worldwide. So why isn't anyone asking for it?

In this episode, we break down exactly what hair analysis could reveal, the forensic science behind segmental testing, and why both the prosecution and defense may have strategic reasons to avoid this evidence entirely. We examine what's known about Eric's autopsy, the contested witness testimony, and what a jury deserves to know before deciding Kouri Richins' fate.

This isn't about speculation. It's about asking why the most definitive evidence available might be sitting in the ground — if Eric was buried — while both sides fight over witnesses who keep changing their stories.

Hair doesn't recant. Hair doesn't cut deals. Hair tells the truth.

Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty to all charges. She is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrime #FentanylPoisoning #ForensicScience #HairAnalysis #UtahMurder #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeYouTube #JusticeForEric

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers with Tony Brewski. Here now, Tony Brucey.

0:07.4

Corey Richens' trial starts in just a few weeks. Jury selection begins on February 10th,

0:14.4

and right now both sides are in the final stretch, fighting over what evidence gets in, what

0:19.5

stays out, which witnesses are credible,

0:21.5

which ones aren't.

0:23.2

The defense says a key witness recanted.

0:25.8

The prosecution says recantation is incredible, back and forth motions and counter motions,

0:31.3

the usual free trial warfare.

0:33.5

I got something for both of you.

0:35.9

You're ready?

0:37.3

For the prosecution and the defense.

0:39.7

And I don't know who it's going to benefit.

0:44.8

But listen up.

0:48.2

Depending on which side you're on.

0:50.1

Or both sides.

0:51.3

Listen up.

0:53.1

And you guys listen up too because I really want to get your thoughts on this.

0:58.2

Because here's what nobody is talking about.

1:01.9

There's a piece of evidence potentially in this case that could answer the central question

1:06.8

definitively.

1:10.0

Not through witness testimony,

1:11.9

not through text messages or cell tower data

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.