What you know, alibiers, welcome to another episode of Pretty Lies and Alibis. I'm Gigi. Good to have you here. It's

Thursday, December 11th. I thought we would be eyeball deep in the defense case in the Brian Walls trial,

but they rested without calling any witnesses, which is different from what his defense attorney said

during openings, which was Brian was going to take the stand.

They said after hearing two key witnesses yesterday, they decided not to.

I would venture a guess it would have been Jim who spent New Year's Eve with them as well as Anna's friend Alyssa from D.C.

Very powerful testimony, very credible, and really gave a lot of

insight into who Anna was. Not sure you can come back from that. So tomorrow we'll have

closings and I think a very quick verdict, but we'll see. I'll be live streaming, starting at 9 a.m.

for closings. So come hang out with us.

We're going to go through a couple of motions in the Corey Richens case.

I received about 10 different documents this week, and I've been wanting to kind of chip away at these.

I do not think these have been ruled on yet, but I will keep an eye out for any rulings.

The first is a state's motion to pre-admit defendants interview statements and email.

The first section, Relief, requested, and grounds.

The state of Utah requests the court pre-admit the defendant's statements provided two detectives during an interview on April 14, 2023, and an April 17th,

2023 follow-up email to detectives.

The statements and email are admissible because they're authentic, not hearsay, relevant.

Their probative value is not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice and they are complete.

The statement of relevant facts. Number one, Texas interviewed the defendant at her

residence on April 14, 2023. That interview was contemporaneously recorded and subsequently

transcribed. Number two, the interview contains six distinct

...