We need to talk about the election interference case in which Donald was found guilty of 34 felony accounts, more commonly known and erroneously known as the hush money case.

Watch this clip.

A New York judge has rejected President-elect Donald Trump's request to throw out his conviction in the criminal hushmoney case.

Judge Juan Mershan said in a court filing Monday, the Supreme Court's ruling giving

president's immunity from prosecution over official acts does not apply to this case.

A jury convicted Trump in May on 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal

hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in the lead up to the 2016

election. Trump sentencing had been delayed while the judge considered the impact of the Supreme

Court's ruling. Okay, just for clarity, this is very important to me. Yes, he paid hush money

in order to commit election of interference. He was found guilty by a jury of his

peers. He was supposed to be sentenced back in July, and I completely disagreed with Justice

Roshan's decision to delay sentencing in order to take into the egregious Supreme Court

ruling on presidential immunity, but I'm pretty sure he wasn't listening. So here we are after the

election, and despite having been found guilty of those 34 felony accounts, Donald still has not

been sentenced, and maybe that might have made a difference, but of course, we'll never know.

So Mershawne wisely came to the conclusion that presidential immunity for official access

absolutely nothing to do with state crimes Donald committed before he was in the Oval

Office.

So we're going to have to see how this plays out.

But before we discuss the massive litigation-fueled house spin that Donald was sent into by Mershans' ruling,

please do me a favor. Take a second to like and share and subscribe to our channel and share

our channel with other people you think might enjoy it. It's easy and it's free. Okay, so

...