Politics without the soap opera with unfiltered constitutional conservative truth.

The Conservative Review with Daniel Burns.

And welcome back fellow American patriots and Minutemen standing at the ready to fight anew

for the issues that matter and the way they matter at the time they matter.

And that issue on this Tuesday is yet again the issue of all

issues. Judicial supremacism. Who gets to decide every political, societal, constitutional,

legal question, everything that matters to our lifetime. The courts are back in the news today

as they'll continue to be in the news.

So today we're going to do something a little bit different.

We're going to have a law professor on the show to whom I'm going to bounce off some of my ideas and see if he agrees with them, both historically, legally constitutionally, but also in terms of gaming out where he thinks the Supreme Court is going to go.

So we're going to have Professor Josh Blackman coming up in a moment.

The interview will be up on a video, see our podcast, Rumble, if you want to watch that portion of the show.

But first, I do want to get into what happened yesterday in the Supreme Court

because I think there's a little bit of misunderstanding that on the surface there were two

wins at the Supreme Court. But if you look carefully, it kind of affirms my thesis that if you don't do

anything to delegitimize judicial supremacism or at least have Congress in a must-pass bill

limit the erroneous ill-gotten power, you're going to continue to have the Supreme Court,

you're going to expend all your capital

with John Roberts' scorecard

on some of the minor nebulous things

that should never be in court,

but fundamentally the bigger things you want to do

...