We're going to stick with Fornier, right?

Anything else on this or cap or no cap time?

Cap or no cap time.

We can, if you want to get up there, and there we go.

All right, so yeah, Evan Forne, au revoir, or abiento.

I mean, it's not going to be abiento.

I doubt we're going to see him soon.

I would imagine if the Knicks really didn't want him to be with the team because he was upset, they might just say, hey, stick around. But strange the things have happened. So let's make an assumption. And maybe this doesn't turn out the way that it should, but these are kind of where I've assumed. So let's assume that the Knicks would be

comfortable with or like more money going out than coming back in because they're not too

far away from the luxury tax with likely and unlike, well, really more unlikely bonuses,

that they'd be comfortable with or like expiring money fitting into the OB-Toppen traded player exception,

that any trade involving Evan Fornier would generate a traded player exception that's large enough to keep the door open for, say, like, a player like OG and an OB.

Should he become available, someone of that size contract-wise, or returning salary

that could be flipped for, again, a player like OG? Any of that feel, any of that not pass the

smell test or anything you'd like to add to that, John? The only thing I would add is that

if you, if anybody listening doubt to any of this,

they should go back and check out Michael Scotto's reporting from about a week and a half ago

where basically he said the next were trying to make a trade,

which would have checked three of these, three of these boxes.

So yeah, exactly.

So let's start with the first type of trade, right? A star.

Obviously, you can put the name of the star that you want in there, assuming that they make a larger

...