music

Welcome back to another edition of the Federalist Radio Hour. I'm Emily Dishinsky

Culture Editor here at the Federalist Joint today by my colleague Christopher Bedford

Senior Editor at the Federalist on this occasion of the day in which we heard

historic oral arguments as that related to the case or in the case of Dobbs V. B. Jackson.

Chris, this was fascinating to get this level of insight into the

justices thinking as it pertains to row, as it pertains to Casey, and now as it

pertains to Dobbs, I'm going to put up for everyone watching on a live stream

ahead line from CNBC that reads Supreme Court Conservatives look ready to gut

Roe v Wade during arguments in Mississippi abortion case. The implication of

that is when the decision is handed down in Dobbs, Roe v Wade's federal

implications would be undermined, would be overturned, and states would be left

to their own basically immediately to determine how they legislate and how

they govern the issue of abortion. What did you think of the oral arguments

that played out today, Chris? I think that the pro-life side executed

flawlessly. They stated largely, basically entirely on mark, they stuck exactly

to the facts. I didn't just simply rely on any motion, and I think the left

seemingly did not. You got a good idea from some of the questioning, some of

the harder lines of questioning, some of the more drilling down that the

conservative judges were engaged, including surprisingly, maybe not

surprisingly. It comports to this faith entirely, but just as Brett Kavanaugh, who

was really engaged in this discussion. Now, it's worth

...