Yeah, just sort of the, it's not necessarily the good, the bad, and the other. And we will open it up for calls in about 20 minutes. Your thoughts on Super Bowl 60 in the performance by the Seattle Seahawks. But it's more of an overarching kind of thought on how the game went from both perspectives.

I'll start with this.

And it's to me the thing that was most interesting because I actually didn't anticipate this.

Going into this game, I actually thought there was a chance for New England dead wrong. I thought there was a chance

for New England to move the football. And the reason for that is the Rams did it so successfully

with really good receivers, good scheme, getting open, a quarterback that was getting the ball out,

a running game that worked. And I thought

with Stevenson, and I thought with their receivers and the route running ability and the

scheme, I thought they had a better chance in some ways to move the football against Seattle than they

did against Denver on the road, especially when the weather turned badly.

And here's the other thing. Denver's offense was so much more limited than Seattle's.

And so it played into the kind of game that Vrable and McDaniels decided to call in the

AFC title game, which was, we're okay punting eight times.

We are going to let our defense win the game.

That's the way they played the Super Bowl.

The Patriots came in playing not to lose.

But for it to work, they needed to do one thing more than anything else.

They had to stop the run, legitimately put the game on

Darnold, and hoped that he made the key mistake that Jared Stidham made, you know, in the

AFC title game. That's the game that New England decided was their best chance to hang in there and win, was to not allow

Drake May and the offense, and I'm saying the offense as a whole, because the offensive line

on the left side in particular was a mess. We'll get to that. But it was, we're not confident

...