Keir Starmer gets angry
Coffee House Shots
The Spectator
4.4 • 2.2K Ratings
🗓️ 11 February 2026
⏱️ 15 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
PMQs today and – as predicted – Keir Starmer came out worst in a pretty unpleasant session. Kemi Badenoch pinned the Prime Minister on the continued Mandelson fallout and now the scandal over Matthew Doyle, the former No. 10 comms chief who – just four weeks after his ennoblement – Labour have already been forced to kick out of their party in the House of Lords, after it emerged he had campaigned for a friend charged with possessing indecent images of children. Once again, one of those mysterious appointments for which the Prime Minister is never responsible came back to haunt him in public – sound familiar?
The response from the Prime Minister was to get increasingly shirty, including with Sir Ed Davey, who accused the PM of a ‘catastrophic lack of judgment’ in his most punchy PMQs yet. Are we finally getting to understand the ‘real’ Keir Starmer?
James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman.
Produced by Oscar Edmondson.
Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.
For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.
Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, welcome to Coffee House Shots. I'm James Heel and I'm joined today by Isabel Harbman and Tim Shipman. |
| 0:10.4 | Now this afternoon, it's been promised questions. Tim, who came out on top this week? |
| 0:14.7 | Well, I mean, it's more a case of who came out on bottom, I think, which was Keir Starma, who had a pretty torrid time. |
| 0:22.6 | I think the most striking thing about this was just how absolutely unpleasant the whole thing was. |
| 0:27.6 | Starma is in a right old knack about being put on the spot about the departure of half of his staff, |
| 0:34.4 | and then Kemmy Badernaut kind of nailed him to the wall on the peerage for |
| 0:39.5 | Matthew Doyle, his former director of communications, who was campaigning for someone who was then |
| 0:45.4 | convicted of having child porn, essentially. And, you know, coming off the back of the Mandelson thing, |
| 0:51.4 | Kemi Bader Nock said, you know, this is what a former prosecutor might call a pattern of behaviour, which was sort of a decent line. And what the point she wanted to nail, and I think she did, it was a pretty, it was a decent performance, so it wasn't one of her absolute classics. And Starma just didn't answer anything. He was just throwing around. Your party's shrinking, you're terrible. You're all terrible. We're brilliant. But the key line, I think, and the argument she was trying to |
| 1:16.1 | prosecute, she basically said to Stama, he only cares about the victims when he's trying to save his |
| 1:20.5 | own skin. And she said that applied to the grooming gangs, where he tried to resist, holding an |
| 1:26.2 | inquiry until it became impossible not to. It was the same with Mandelson, where he tried to resist holding an inquiry until it became impossible |
| 1:27.6 | not to. It was the same with Mandelson, where, you know, he initially defended him before |
| 1:32.1 | firing him and then said, oh, we've all been lied to, it's all terrible, nothing to do with me, Gov. |
| 1:36.5 | And then now the Matthew Dawes situation, where the Sunday Times, and I'll, we should name |
| 1:42.9 | the journalist, Gabriel Pogran, a protégé of mine when I worked there, brilliant author of two books about the Labour Party. |
| 1:50.0 | One of the finest reporters in the land has been going on at this for months and months. |
| 1:55.1 | And Doyle's peerage was confirmed after Pogrand had written a front-page story in the Sunday Times, |
| 2:01.3 | basically saying, this is completely wrong and look what this guy was up to. |
| 2:06.8 | And Stama, you know, just sort of has ignored it. |
| 2:09.7 | For months and months, they claim there was an investigation. |
| 2:11.5 | They won't say who investigated it, what questions they asked and what it concluded, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

