I mean, I just thought we'd mentioned Labour there, and I suppose these are about Labour's

vision. Now, Keir Starmer, let's just have a little look at what happened, what kind

of revelation, if you like, on Friday, which was Paul War, who I'd say is someone who

the Labour leadership are very favourable towards. He's not the I. He said that Labour's likely

to ditch Jeremy Corbyn's 2019 pledge to high-income tax on those earning more than £80,000. Parties

look at more creative ways of making the rich pay more. I should say that's not just 2019.

I think 2019 manifesto, obviously, is associated now with an ATC Tory majority, get that.

It was also in the 2017 manifesto, because of 2019 manifesto, I think a lot of people

even, I think, around Jeremy Corbyn believe that that manifesto was just excessively policy,

heavy, because the Labour leadership would desperately, the time trying to shift the conversation

away from Brexit, which they succeeded in doing in 2017, but by 2019, the country was so

polarized, it just wasn't a runner at all. But anyway, that's why there's so many policies

at it. So even amongst many of the people around Corbyn's team, they kind of think, well,

2019 manifesto had a lot, it was noisy. The 2017 manifesto, on the other hand, was,

you know, described by Kirst Starrmer as the foundational document of the Labour Party

in the leadership contest. In fact, let's just be very clear, because Kirst Starrmer's

going back on this commitment to income tax, forget about the 2019 manifesto, it was

in his leadership campaign. So it was pledge number one. He did 10 pledges. Now, I think

some people don't understand, I don't want to be patronising here, but I think some

of Kirst Starrmer's most militant support don't understand what pledge means. The definition

of pledges a solemn promise or undertaking. Pledge number one, economic justice, increasing

income tax for top five percent of earners, reverse the Tory's cuts in corporation tax,

...