Kash Patel: Durham Hits Clinton Campaign with ‘Joint Venture Conspiracy’; Sussmann Defense ‘in Shambles’
Kash's Corner
Kash Patel
4.8 • 627 Ratings
🗓️ 7 April 2022
⏱️ 39 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
“What I find most striking about this pleading is John Durham’s use of the joint venture/conspiracy exception to [Rule] 404(b).”
Special counsel John Durham says he has evidence of a joint venture or conspiracy involving the Clinton campaign. In this episode, we discuss the details of Durham’s latest 48-page filing, why ex-Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann has a defense that is now “in shambles,” according to Kash, and what Kash sees as perhaps the greatest irony of all in Sussmann’s defense.
“The defense lawyers for Michael Sussmann, in a federal pleading, are calling the Christopher Steele dossier ‘inflammatory.’”
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hey everybody and welcome back to Cash's Corner. |
| 0:14.0 | So Cash, we had a pretty interesting episode plans. |
| 0:19.0 | And then John Durham came in and just threw a spanner into the whole works. |
| 0:22.6 | He totally messed it up, Yon. So I guess we're going to talk about all things special counsel in John Durham and put off the rest for another 10. |
| 0:28.6 | And motions in limine. I mean, as we keep learning all these kind of arcane legal jargon. So what is that all about? |
| 0:36.6 | Okay, so John Durham came in on a late night |
| 0:39.7 | during one of the weekdays of this week and filed what's called a motions in limine. He was |
| 0:44.7 | actually responding to a defense motion in limine. And all that means is pre-trial motions. |
| 0:49.8 | It's fancy Latin that lawyers get to throw around and sound cool. I did when I was a federal public defender and a national security prosecutor. |
| 0:56.2 | Basically, it's setting up what you're going to do at trial is the easiest way to think about it. |
| 1:02.5 | The defense has things they want to accomplish and the prosecution is things they want to accomplish. |
| 1:06.2 | And the rules of evidence sort of govern when you have to file these things and who you have to put on notice and what the prosecution's responsibilities are for due process and all that stuff. |
| 1:15.1 | We don't have to get into the weeds of that. |
| 1:16.3 | A, the defense on behalf of suspect came in and said a couple of things basically outlining what their defense is going to be. |
| 1:23.5 | And you and I have talked about this before, y'all. |
| 1:25.2 | I think the defense has made a number of strategic blunders, not legal or ethical, strategic blunders along the way of this prosecution. |
| 1:33.3 | If you recall in a previous episode or two, we talked about how they asked the defense asked John Durham for more evidence at a higher clip. |
| 1:41.3 | John Durham obliged and gave them lots of evidence very publicly |
| 1:45.5 | because he was allowed to do that pursuant to that request. And then they basically said, |
| 1:49.4 | okay, wait, wait, thanks. That's enough. We don't need anymore. Then the defense issued a motion |
| 1:54.4 | to dismiss just the other week, which was, I thought a shocking move, especially in federal |
| 2:00.0 | court, since there's technically no actual mechanism to do that. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kash Patel, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Kash Patel and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.