Kash Patel: Clinton Campaign Affiliates Are Trying to Bury Michael Sussmann | Kash’s Corner
Kash's Corner
Kash Patel
4.8 • 627 Ratings
🗓️ 25 April 2022
⏱️ 41 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
“[Durham] now has Clinton world burying Michael Sussmann, the defendant in this case.”
Clinton campaign affiliates are throwing former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann under the bus, says Kash Patel. And in a last-ditch effort to protect themselves, they are trying to hide evidence behind attorney-client privilege, he argues.
Kash and Jan break down special counsel John Durham’s latest filing and the significance of the flurry of responses from Clinton campaign affiliates, including former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, campaign manager Robby Mook, campaign lawyer Marc Elias, opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and tech executive Rodney Joffe.
According to Durham’s filing, the CIA knew in early 2017 that the Alfa Bank allegations tying Trump to Russia were likely false. At the same time, the FBI intentionally avoided coming to conclusions on the veracity of these allegations, Kash argues.
We discuss all this and more in this episode of Kash’s Corner.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hey everybody and welcome back to Cash's Corner. |
| 0:14.0 | So Cash on Easter Friday, John Durham decided in the wee hours of the morning put up a really significant filing. |
| 0:24.4 | I mean, we jumped on it right away. |
| 0:26.3 | And that actually precipitated a whole flurry of responses to that filing. |
| 0:33.1 | So let's break it down. |
| 0:34.4 | What's going on? |
| 0:35.1 | Well, I think we need like six straight episodes to do it, but we'll try to get it done in one. |
| 0:39.3 | The Friday pleading is basically the only filing from John Durham's side of the case. |
| 0:45.3 | It's the United States versus Michael Susman. |
| 0:47.3 | John Durham issues what's basically called a responsive pleading saying, |
| 0:51.3 | these are the reasons why all the defense's positions on |
| 0:54.3 | 404b on this type of evidence on that witness and that witness they're all wrong |
| 0:57.6 | this is why I'm right very substantive pleading fast forward to this week in the |
| 1:03.2 | evening hours of this week the defense suspend plus a whole host of other individuals that have been named throughout this case |
| 1:14.0 | filed 14 or 16 pleadings in the matter of 24 hours. It's very, very, very unusually on. |
| 1:21.1 | And we'll break that down and get into what the defense side's pleadings are and how they actually used |
| 1:27.3 | other pleadings of non-members, |
| 1:31.4 | that is non-parties to the litigation, came in and airmailed in their own pleadings. So it's very |
| 1:37.0 | interesting. It's very rare. But I think it shows one of the most significant things to date in the |
| 1:42.6 | John Durham investigation is that he's got Clinton |
| 1:45.2 | world scrambling and on the run. There's one particular sentence in here. It's actually in parentheses, |
| 1:53.4 | bizarrely, that struck me as the sort of kind of the critical element in this pleading. But maybe |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kash Patel, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Kash Patel and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.