Welcome to the LRB podcast. If you subscribe to the LRB, you can save up to 75% on the cover price.

Visit lrb.com.uk forward slash subscribe. Or you can register for free and open up our entire

online archive for 24 hours. Visit lrb.com.uk forward slash open.

A colleague of mine at Oxford was asked to see an undergraduate who was falling behind in her work.

The student, a Muslim, explained that she had been suffering from depression and was being treated for it by her GP.

My colleague believed that the student's explanation placed her under an obligation

to ask the student whether she was being radicalised. A young colleague, an Arab, told me that when

he tried to book a room for a seminar, he was informed that this was no longer permitted on security

grounds. He had to get a senior academic to confirm the

real purpose of the meeting. Another young colleague was told that she had to carry out a security

risk assessment for a feminist seminar she was convening. She refused and was repeatedly pressured to

comply.

A librarian was asked for a reference by another university.

Are you completely satisfied, they wanted to know,

that the applicant is not involved in extremism,

being vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values,

including democracy, the rule of law,

individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs.

Out of the blue, a college head refused the usual joint arrangements with a university centre

for a lecture by a very distinguished European academic,

whose work is on the politics of Islam.

Special Branch had informed the college that a great deal of extra security would be required.

...