Karen Read Trial: Dr. Marie Russell Part 3 of 3
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe
Tony Brueski
2.2 • 614 Ratings
🗓️ 5 June 2025
⏱️ 99 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Description: The final segment of Dr. Marie Russell's extensive medical testimony brings her forensic pathology analysis to its conclusion, addressing remaining medical questions and withstanding rigorous cross-examination from the defense team. In this climactic portion of her testimony, Dr. Russell faces challenging questions about her methodology, conclusions, and the certainty of her findings regarding John O'Keefe's cause and manner of death.
This concluding testimony likely covers Dr. Russell's responses to defense challenges about alternative theories of death, including questions about whether O'Keefe could have died from other causes such as a fall, an assault, or exposure to cold weather. The defense's cross-examination tests the limits of her scientific conclusions and explores any uncertainties or limitations in the medical evidence. Dr. Russell must defend her professional opinions while acknowledging the boundaries of what medical science can definitively prove about the circumstances of O'Keefe's death.
The final portion of her testimony also addresses any remaining toxicology questions, the significance of alcohol in O'Keefe's system, and how intoxication may have affected his condition during his final hours. Dr. Russell's complete testimony synthesizes all the medical evidence into a comprehensive picture that supports or challenges the prosecution's theory of how Karen Read allegedly caused O'Keefe's death with her vehicle.
As the medical expert's testimony concludes, the jury receives the complete scientific foundation for understanding what happened to John O'Keefe on a medical level. Dr. Russell's three-part testimony represents the prosecution's most important expert evidence, providing the medical and scientific basis for the murder charges against Karen Read. Her conclusions about the nature, timing, and cause of O'Keefe's injuries become central to the jury's ultimate decision about whether the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Karen Read intentionally or recklessly caused John O'Keefe's death through vehicular assault.
Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #MedicalTestimony #DrMarieRussell #ForensicEvidence #CrossExamination #MedicalExpert #TrialConclusion #TrialTestimony #TrueCrime #ExpertWitness
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brewski and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reid. |
| 0:07.0 | All right, Mr. Alessie, I'll hear you. |
| 0:12.0 | Thank you, Your Honor. |
| 0:14.0 | Attorney Brennan, just with regard to Dr. Russell, in open court in front of the jury, |
| 0:25.6 | used the concept of DNA in this case. |
| 0:30.2 | He has introduced it and brought it in for the very first time in front of the jury. |
| 0:35.7 | He has done so intentionally. He intentionally brought up DNA. |
| 0:40.3 | Based upon that intentional mention, the defense moves strongly, vigorously for a mistrial with prejudice. |
| 0:51.3 | A mistrial with prejudice. There has been no mention in this trial of DNA with regard to the topic, |
| 1:07.2 | with regard to what Mr. Brennan has raised. There has been none. Specifically, |
| 1:13.6 | the prosecution had, in the first trial, had a witness Terry Coon with regard to DNA. |
| 1:22.6 | For whatever reason, the prosecution has chosen not to bring that witness in who would |
| 1:30.3 | testify perhaps to DNA. |
| 1:36.3 | As a result of that strategic decision that the prosecution made, there's been no mention. |
| 1:42.3 | I want to be very clear, the defense has been incredibly |
| 1:46.3 | assiduous and meticulous about not mentioning DNA in any fashion directly or indirectly. |
| 1:55.7 | With regard to the hoodie shirt and the whole, the only thing that was adduced and direct examination |
| 2:04.5 | was a mechanical function simply if Dr. Russell testifying |
| 2:09.2 | that a dog tooth went in and caused and came out |
| 2:15.3 | and caused a certain mechanical effect on the yarn. |
| 2:20.3 | Nothing even close to the mention of D.N.A. |
| 2:25.3 | With regard to representations that Attorney Brennan has made, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.