meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

Karen Read Trial: Dr. Marie Russell Part 2 of 3

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

Tony Brueski

News, News Commentary, True Crime

2.2614 Ratings

🗓️ 5 June 2025

⏱️ 85 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Karen Read Trial: Dr. Marie Russell Part 2 of 3

Description: In this second installment of Dr. Marie Russell's comprehensive medical testimony, the forensic pathologist delves deeper into the technical aspects of her autopsy findings and medical analysis of John O'Keefe's death. Dr. Russell's continued testimony builds upon her initial findings, providing more detailed explanations of the injuries observed during the autopsy and her professional interpretation of how those injuries occurred.

This portion of her testimony likely addresses the specific trauma patterns found on O'Keefe's body, including detailed analysis of head injuries, abrasions, and any other physical evidence discovered during the post-mortem examination. Dr. Russell's expertise allows her to explain complex medical concepts in terms the jury can understand, while maintaining the scientific rigor necessary for expert testimony in a murder trial. Her analysis covers the sequence of injuries, the amount of force required to cause specific trauma, and her professional opinion about the mechanisms that caused O'Keefe's death.

The continuation of Dr. Russell's testimony also addresses questions about time of death, the effects of cold weather exposure on the body, and how environmental factors may have affected the condition of the remains when they were discovered. Her medical expertise becomes crucial in helping the jury understand whether the physical evidence supports the prosecution's theory that O'Keefe was struck by Karen Read's vehicle or whether alternative explanations for his injuries are medically plausible.

Dr. Russell's testimony represents the scientific foundation of the prosecution's case, as her medical conclusions about cause and manner of death directly support the charges against Karen Read. Her detailed analysis of autopsy findings, toxicology results, and injury patterns provides the medical evidence necessary to prove that O'Keefe's death was a homicide rather than an accident or natural death, making her testimony one of the most critical components of the prosecution's case against the defendant.

Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #MedicalTestimony #DrMarieRussell #ForensicEvidence #Autopsy #MedicalExpert #CauseOfDeath #TrialTestimony #TrueCrime #ExpertWitness

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? 

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brewski and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reid.

0:11.6

Yeah.

0:12.5

Yes.

0:13.5

Good morning, doctor.

0:15.0

Good morning, Mr. Brennan.

0:18.2

I had asked you yesterday if your opinions regarding the wounds on Mr. O'Kee's arm changed between

0:26.6

when you testified last year and then the more recent hearings that we've had over the past

0:33.1

four or five months. Do you remember that question? Yes. And when I asked you that question,

0:37.6

I asked if you had help with your report, and you told us that there was a woman who helped

0:42.5

you with your report? I told you that there was someone who helped me or made suggestions in

0:49.5

organizing the report, having certain sentences placed in certain categories.

0:55.0

When I asked you about the identity, the person who actually helped you,

1:01.0

I asked you if it was one of the attorneys and you had said no?

1:05.0

That is correct.

1:07.0

May I approach, Your Honor?

1:09.0

Yes.

1:10.0

May I ask the question? I approached, Your Honor. Yes.

1:14.8

May I ask the question?

1:15.3

Yes.

1:21.0

You had testified in December 22nd, 2024 in this case?

1:24.0

I believe it was that date, yes.

1:27.2

And when you testified back in December of 24, do you remember I asked you who it was

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.