meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Karen Read Trial Aftermath: Breaking Down Albert’s & Proctor’s ABC Interviews

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

True Crime, News, News Commentary

3791 Ratings

🗓️ 23 June 2025

⏱️ 59 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Karen Read Trial Aftermath: Breaking Down Albert’s & Proctor’s ABC Interviews

Description:
In this episode, we unpack two pivotal ABC 20/20 interviews that unfolded in the immediate aftermath of Karen Read’s acquittal on second-degree murder charges for the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. Firstly, crime scene host Matt Gutman sits down with Michael Proctor — the now-disgraced former Massachusetts State Trooper who led the original investigation and was later dismissed after a string of shocking, misogynistic text messages about Read were made public. Proctor candidly addresses every major controversy: from the crudeness of his private texts to the explosive accusations that he may have tampered with evidence—such as the taillight of Read’s vehicle. He refutes all conspiratorial claims, insisting there was “no conspiracy” and that his investigative methods followed protocol, even conceding that perhaps “we could have looked at other people’s cars just to say we did it” to avoid the conspiracy narrative.

Secondly, we break down an insightful interview with Brian Albert, whose suburban Canton home was the scene of that tragic night when O’Keefe’s body was found in the snow. Albert weighs in on the defensive theory that O’Keefe was injured inside the house—possibly during a physical altercation or dog attack—and then staged to implicate Read. His ABC segment adds emotional depth and scrutiny as he voices lingering concerns over jurors’ doubt and calls the verdict “a devastating miscarriage of justice” .

Through extensive analysis, this episode contrasts Proctor’s steadfast defense of his legitimacy with Albert’s heartfelt challenge to the acquittal. We proceed chronologically: evaluating the strongest rebuttals Proctor issues, the live reactions from both the investigator and the victim’s inner circle, and how these interviews shape public and legal discourse around the case. We also assess the broader implications—how Proctor’s firing and testimony may impact police accountability reforms, and whether Albert’s spotlight will pressure the ongoing civil lawsuit filed by O’Keefe’s family.

Listeners will come away with a nuanced understanding of the emotions, contradictions, and lasting tensions that persist after one of Massachusetts’ most divisive trials. This is more than a post-trial recap—it’s a layered examination of power, perception, and the pursuit of justice.

Hashtags:
#KarenReadTrial #MichaelProctor #BrianAlbert #ABC2020 #CaseAftermath #JusticeDebate #TrueCrimeBreakdown

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? 

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Murder in the Morning with Tony Bruske and Stacey Cole.

0:05.5

That it is, and we're going to break down some of the interviews that have been given now in the wake of the trial of Karen Reed.

0:15.9

A lot of them going to ABC News.

0:19.4

The folks, the Alberts, the Proctor, the, I think the McCabes are in some of these,

0:27.7

but we're going to go through some of them and just see what they have to say.

0:32.2

These are folks, some had testified during the trial, some did not, some were never called,

0:37.0

some were testifying in the first trial.

0:38.8

But these are a lot of the key players who are in, or have been named in the conspiracy in court as accusing them of being involved in the death of John O'Keefe.

0:50.4

Obviously, Karen Reid found not guilty.

0:52.7

But that does not mean that these people killed

0:55.5

John O'Keefe. That is, they don't have to prove anything. That was just, they can say,

1:00.9

this happened, some, somebody else killed him. It wasn't Karen and that's it. And, well, maybe it was,

1:08.1

maybe it was these people. There's never going to be charges brought against any of these people, I'm sure.

1:14.7

But I've been very interested to hear their reaction to all of this.

1:19.7

Some of the jurors have spoken as well.

1:22.8

I know you've seen some of that.

1:23.9

What's been your reaction, Stacey?

1:25.7

What I'm most intrigued by is there were people who went into the jury

1:30.9

deliberation room thinking she was guilty. And upon hearing the discussion within the room,

1:39.7

they changed their mind that I guess there wasn't enough evidence that that he was struck by the car.

1:46.9

And I'm also very surprised, and we'll hear this in one of the jurors talking about it, that they

1:53.2

didn't pull the jurors when they walked into the room. They didn't say, all right, let's take an

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.