meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Karen Read's Defense Pushes for Charge Dismissal in Murder Case as ACLU Files Amicus Brief

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

True Crime, News, News Commentary

3.3907 Ratings

🗓️ 17 October 2024

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Massachusetts have submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) of Massachusetts in support of Karen Read’s ongoing legal battle. Read, a former adjunct professor from Mansfield, is appealing to have two charges dismissed in her murder case. The ACLU’s brief was accepted by the court but did not immediately reveal their stance or include a summary of their position.

Karen Read faces accusations related to the death of Boston police officer John O’Keefe, who prosecutors claim was struck by Read's SUV and left to die in the snow following a night out in Canton. Read, however, maintains her innocence, contending that O’Keefe was assaulted inside the house of another Boston officer, Brian Albert, before being left outside. Her first trial ended in a mistrial after the jury, comprising six men and six women, reached a deadlock. Some jurors have since come forward, stating they had reached a consensus to acquit her of the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene.

Following the mistrial, Read's defense sought to have these two charges dismissed. Judge Beverly Cannone denied this motion, leading to the appeal now before the SJC. Read’s legal team contends that the jury’s alleged agreement should constitute an acquittal on these counts and argues that protections against double jeopardy should prevent a retrial on the charges.

“The court relied solely upon the lack of an ‘open and public verdict affirmed in open court,’” the defense wrote, referencing Judge Cannone’s decision. “This reasoning is rooted in a formalism that has been consistently rejected by the United States Supreme Court and this Court in a string of precedents spanning more than one hundred years.”

The defense also believes that the Supreme Judicial Court should allow a post-trial inquiry into the jury’s statements, which they argue constitutes an “overt factor” that should prompt further investigation. Additionally, they are questioning Judge Cannone’s decision to declare a mistrial when she did, given the alleged consensus from the jurors.

District Attorney Michael Morrissey, responding to the appeal, has appointed Attorney Hank Brennan as special prosecutor for Read’s case. Brennan, known for his work in other high-profile cases, will lead the prosecution when Read’s second trial, currently scheduled for January 27, begins. The Norfolk District Attorney’s Office stated that their response to Read’s appeal will be submitted by the court's deadline, with Read's attorneys expected to reply shortly after.

Should the  Supreme Judicial Court side with Read’s defense and dismiss the charges, it would mark a significant development in a case that has drawn extensive public and media attention. If the charges are upheld, Read faces up to life in prison for second-degree murder, as well as significant penalties on charges of manslaughter while operating under the influence and leaving the scene of a personal injury and death.

Throughout the trial, prosecutors faced setbacks, including complications with surveillance footage and misconduct among investigators, which has contributed to the intense scrutiny of the case. The defense has also raised these issues in their appeal, seeking to underscore what they argue are critical flaws in the prosecution's case.

With oral arguments scheduled to take place before the SJC, Read and her legal team are preparing for a pivotal hearing that could determine the course of the upcoming trial. For now, the court's decision will hinge on whether the defense’s arguments regarding jury consensus, double jeopardy, and procedural conduct are persuasive enough to merit the dismissal of charges or, at the very least, a re-evaluation of the trial’s conduct.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Broadcasting live from the true crime today's studios to the world.

0:05.5

This is Murder in the Morning with Tony Brewski and Stacy Cole.

0:10.0

From the hit killers podcast, Murder in the morning.

0:16.9

So, attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts have submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in support of Karen Reid's ongoing legal battle.

0:32.8

Reid, a former abjunct professor from Mansfield, is appealing to have two charges dismissed in the murder case.

0:40.1

The ACLU's brief was accepted by the court but did not immediately reveal their stance or

0:44.8

include a summary of their position. Karen Reid now faces accusations related to the death of Boston

0:50.5

police officer John O'Keefe, who prosecutors claim was struck by Reed's SUV and

0:55.8

left to die in the snow following a night out in Canton. Reed, however, maintains her innocence,

1:02.0

contending that O'Keefe was assaulted inside the house of another Boston officer, Brian Elbert,

1:07.7

before being left outside. Her final trial ended in a mistrial after the jury,

1:12.5

comprised of six men and six women, reached a deadlock.

1:16.1

Some jurors have since come forward, stating that they have reached consensus to acquit her

1:20.3

of the charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene.

1:23.1

Following the mistrial, Reeds defense sought to have these two charges dismissed. Judge Beverly

1:27.9

Kenow denied this motion leading to the appeal. Now before the SJC, the Supreme Court there,

1:35.9

Reed's legal team contends that the jury's alleged agreement should constitute an acquittal

1:41.0

on these counts and argues that protections against double jeopardy

1:44.9

should prevent a retrial on those charges.

1:47.2

The court relied solely upon the lack of an open and public verdict affirmed in open court,

1:53.1

the defense wrote, referencing Judge Kono's decision.

1:55.7

This reasoning is rooted in a formalism that has been consistently rejected by the United

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.