Karen Read's Defense Accused of Deliberate Misrepresentations! Another Trial Date Change?
The Emily Show
Baker Media, LLC.
4.9 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 19 March 2025
⏱️ 17 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
On March 18th, 2025, the Karen Read case was back in court, and things are heating up! Judge Cannone delivers a scathing rebuke to the defense, accusing them of "deliberate misrepresentations" and "flagrant violation" of Rule 14 regarding payments to the ARCCA Expert Witnesses. The judge has a conversation directly with Karen Read to see if she'd like to remove Alan Jackson as her representative, but she declined. The judge doesn't remove Alan Jackson from the defense team, decided not to exclude ARCCA Witness Testimony from the re-trial, and didn't financially sanction the defense team. Instead, she gave them a stern warning and remind them of their obligation of being candor to the court.
The Defense and The Commonwealth's Appellate Attorney ask for the trial date of April 1st, 2025, be pushed back again. This time they didn't request a date due to Karen Read appeal to the First Circuit to try to get counts 1 and 3 dismissed. The judge has taken it under advisement and will reconvene Thursday, March 20th, 2025 to discuss further. The judge is concerned that it will be hard to find a jury due to an HBO documentary about the first trial currently being broadcasted so close to the Re-Trail date.
Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/8VjWKkQrQRM
This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:
Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back. It's time for a quick bit clip. The full episode will be linked in the description, |
| 0:05.7 | but this is the quick bit clip to keep you in the loop for everything that's happening on the |
| 0:11.1 | live stream channel. Let's get into it. It's Tuesday. It's March 18th. I can't believe it. And today, |
| 0:19.0 | we are back in court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts versus Karen Reed. |
| 0:24.1 | There's a lot more hearings on the docket today. |
| 0:26.6 | We are going to be starting with the court giving an oral ruling. |
| 0:31.4 | I was stalking the docket yesterday. |
| 0:34.1 | So we're getting a ruling from the bench on the ARCA experts. So first we had |
| 0:41.1 | full hearing from council. We did have a full hearing. I heard from the lawyers. I heard from Mr. |
| 0:45.7 | Lesse on behalf of the lawyers. I've read the transcripts. I've listened to the sidebar conference |
| 0:51.7 | and read my notes. And I've certainly read the pleadings. |
| 0:56.4 | So based on all the evidence, I conclude that there has not been the candor required of all lawyers has not been demonstrated here. |
| 1:08.4 | Wow. |
| 1:09.7 | Oh, she's still pissed. She's not wrong about the candor. We'll see what she does demonstrated here. Wow. Oh, she's still pissed. |
| 1:11.4 | She's not wrong about the candor. |
| 1:13.3 | We'll see what she does from here. |
| 1:14.9 | It just needs to be the same energy for all the lawyers. |
| 1:17.6 | Let's just keep going. |
| 1:18.3 | There has not been the candor required of all lawyers has not been demonstrated here. |
| 1:27.3 | I find that there have been repeated misrepresentations made to the court by defense counsel, |
| 1:34.3 | and I conclude that they were deliberate. |
| 1:37.9 | Oh, shit. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.