This is continuing coverage of the trial of Karen Reid from the Hidden Killers podcast and true crime today.

Now, back to the courtroom.

This pauses two separate ideas, the way I interpret it. The first is the commonwealth says it needs more audio,

because the redacted audio provided thus far

contains no damaging emissions by read.

The audio provided this far contains many damaging admissions to read.

In her first interview with Gretchen Voss,

she talks about when she dropped John off,

and where she dropped them off.

It's noticeable in many, many interviews, the story changes.

But at one point she has them going to the side door of the house.

In fact, in three of the interviews, he's going to the side door of the house.

In a further interview, she says he went to the front door of the house.

It's not subtle. There's a reason.

The stories and the versions given by Ms. Reid evolve in time.

Coincidentally, they evolve sometimes with the production of discovery.

And so, I am not suggesting for a second that there are no damaging statements by Ms. Reed.

In fact, there are confessions, there are admissions, and there are contradictions based

on later statements given.

And so all I can simply say is that is not the common most position, that is stated wrongly.

Also, or it reveals that she was not entirely forthright in her unsworn press interviews with Voss.

Well, we're entitled to take her statements with Ms. Voss and compare them to all the other statements she made,

...