4.9 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 8 January 2025
⏱️ 8 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Karen Read and her legal team are back in court for the second day of the Daubert Hearing. They are evaluating the Defense 'dog bite expert' to determine what testimony will be permitted in the re-trial and the scope of Dr. Russell's testimony.
We also learned that the prosecution actually went and found the dog, Chloe, and did measurements on her claws and paws and did molds of her jaws and bites as well.
Karen Read is scheduled to go back to court for Oral Arguments with another Daubert Hearing regarding the Digital Defense Expert, Rule 14 Discovery Motions with regard to the ARCA Experts on January 31st, 2025 at 9am ET. Based on how that goes, then possibly we will have an Evidentiary Hearing on February 6th, 2025, at 9am ET that could run into the 7th.
Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/mqwz88FkNm8
RESOURCES
Catch up on Day 1 Quickly - https://youtu.be/587k95WaryI?si=l7QZKWLVnXmBz1mO
Day 1 Full Court Day - https://youtube.com/live/MjU4nGT3TSs
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome back. It's time for a quick bit clip. The full episode will be linked in the description, |
0:05.7 | but this is the quick bit clip to keep you in the loop for everything that's happening on the |
0:11.1 | live stream channel. Let's get into it. Today was the second part of the Dauber evidentiary hearing |
0:18.4 | regarding Dr. Russell. Dr. Russell testified in the first trial regarding the injuries to victim John O'Keefe's arm, |
0:24.6 | testifying that they were most likely from dog bites. |
0:27.6 | Her testimony was fairly limited. |
0:29.6 | Some of that was due to discovery and the fact that she was discovered as a witness in the middle of trial, |
0:36.6 | and it didn't give the Commonwealth a lot of time |
0:39.0 | to find another expert and rebut her testimony, and her testimony at that trial was limited. |
0:45.2 | The special prosecutor has been brought into this case for the retrial, has brought a motion to |
0:50.1 | exclude her as a witness and made some good arguments in his final arguments to the court |
0:55.1 | that there is no scientific process here saying that this is not something that can be repeated, |
1:01.6 | that this is not something that's widely accepted within the community to recognize dog bites |
1:07.4 | through pattern recognition. Of course, when the defense made their arguments at the end of the hearing today, what they |
1:13.7 | said is, well, Your Honor, in other courts, and let me show you the rulings on the other courts, |
1:18.7 | other medical professionals have been allowed in to give this testimony because they have |
1:24.2 | treated wounds from dogs and are able to look at a wound and say, |
1:29.5 | this is a wound that if it came into my ER, in my experience, I look at that wound and go, |
1:35.1 | that is a dog bite. |
1:35.9 | We need to treat it like a dog bite. |
1:37.8 | That wound did not come from a vehicle collision. |
1:40.5 | And the defense is asking that Dr. Russell be allowed to testify to not only that the wounds |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.