Well, it has been an interesting couple of days in the news cycle, as well as the DNC.

And we're going to be going through a lot of different topics, but I think first and foremost,

want to comment on Kamala Harris' excellent plane in order to control prices with government regulation.

That is exactly what will work in order to make things better for economy.

Because as we all know, throughout all of human history,

prices are much better when politicians and bureaucrats,

a select group, of course, can control them.

And that's what essentially Kamala wants at this point.

And even the Washington Post brought out that maybe, maybe if your political opponents are saying you've got some communist sympathies, you shouldn't be rolling out price controls as your solution to inflationary monetary policy.

But here's the deal. A lot of people look at this. Let's be honest, a lot of people will look at this and say, well, yeah, price controls.

Why can't the government tell a greedy business that you got to set the price right here?

What are the practical considerations to that?

So today on this episode, we're not just going to go through and look some of sitting there in a, I think it was a $3,000

outfit talking about how she's skeptical of people that take more than they need. We're not

going to just talk about the funny aspects of this. We're actually going to dig into a little

bit of like, okay, what are the practical economic considerations of some of the things being

discussed? What are the practical legal considerations of some of the things

being discussed? What would it mean for investment? What would it mean for people that are just

trying to find a job or buy a home? Because as much as some of this might sound good on a superficial

level, it actually has really dire consequences. And it's important for people to understand

exactly why. that this isn't

just some sort of partisan disagreement, that there really are reasonable, logical considerations

...