Adam Kinsinger says that there is no comparison between January 6th and the Antifa BLM rights.

And you know what? He's right. The Antifa BLM rights were a lot worse.

Also how the Capitol Police seemed to be modeling themselves on the old KGB.

Terrorism expert Jeffrey Atticott joins me to talk about US foreign policy.

And finally how the Supreme Court might in fact uphold the Mississippi law, restricting abortion,

without overruling Roe vs Wade. This is the Dinesh D'Souza podcast.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy. In a time of confusion, division and lies,

we need a brave voice of reason, understanding and truth. This is the Dinesh D'Souza podcast.

Congressman Adam Kinsinger, one of those never-trump Republicans,

when Nancy Pelosi's favorites, Kevin McCarthy calls him a Pelosi, a Republican.

In any case, Adam Kinsinger insists that there is a huge difference between January 6th and the BLM and Antifa rights.

Now this is interesting because it's the first time someone is trying to actually get their head around an argument.

They're trying to show why January 6th was a lot worse.

And Kinsinger's position could be summed up in a single line. He says,

quote, there's a difference between breaking the law, Antifa BLM, and rejecting the rule of law.

So according to Kinsinger, the January 6th protesters are a real danger to democracy because they didn't just break the law.

They reject the rule of law. Now, I want to probe this distinction at the outset because, first of all, it seems to me,

the January 6th protesters did not reject the rule of law.

They did not reject the idea that we're living in a democracy.

They don't reject the idea that the person with the most electoral votes should be in the White House.

None of that on the contrary.

Their question was, who did win the election? Who did authentically get the majority of electoral votes?

...