You're listening to the Judicial Watch weekly update with Tom Fitton.

Hey everyone, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitten here. Big news this week. We just heard from the Supreme Court that they will take up a Judicial Watch case related to the counting of ballots that arrived after election day.

We had a major lawsuit in Illinois over the counting of ballots that arrive after election

day.

We were representing and are representing Congressman Mike Bossed, BOST from Illinois, two presidential electors.

And in Illinois, they count ballots that arrive for up to 14 days after election day.

And rather than address the merits, the lower courts found that Congressman Boss and our clients

did not have standing, meaning the ability to go to court and essentially challenge this lawlessness

by Illinois, which is contraventing, which is contravening federal law that requires the

counting of ballots that arrive before election day, not after election day, because federal

law sets an election day, not an election week, because federal law sets an election day, not an election

week or month. And we asked the Supreme Court to take up this issue. Do candidates have the right

to try to stop unlawful counting of ballots, contrary to federal law? Well, the Supreme Court

said, well, we're going to consider the issue. And so it was a big announcement this week.

I talked about that issue in a video announcing the big news earlier this week.

Everyone, the Supreme Court just announced today would take up an election law-related challenge

filed by Judicial Watch in Illinois on behalf of a congressman and electors in

Illinois concerned about the counting of ballots that arrive after election day, which they do for

two weeks after election day in Illinois.

That means ballots arrive up to two weeks past election day and they still get counted,

which is contrary to federal law,

which states an election day, not an election week. Now, the congressman, federal candidate,

...