meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
UNBIASED Politics

June 6, 2024: FDA Rescinds Market Ban on Juul Vaping Products, Supreme Court Issues New Decisions, Senate Fails to Move on Contraception Bill, and More.

UNBIASED Politics

Jordan Berman

Education

4.8 • 2.5K Ratings

🗓️ 6 June 2024

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

1. Supreme Court Issues Three New Opinions (0:30)2. FDA Rescinds 'Marketing Denial Order' on Juul Vaping Products Officially Allowing Products to Return to Market (5:04)3. Senate Fails to Move Forward on Federal Right to Contraception Bill (8:45)4. Quick Hitters: Gilgo Beach Murder Suspect Faces More Murder Charges, SpaceX Successfully Tests Starship, Boeing Starliner Docks at ISS, President Biden Says He May Not Pardon Hunter If Convicted (10:01)Watch this episode on YouTube.Follow Jordan on Instagram and TikTok.All sources for this episode can be found here.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to Unbias.

0:02.0

Your favorite source of Unbias News and Legal Analysis.

0:06.0

Welcome back to Unbias.

0:09.0

Today is Thursday June 6th, and this is your final news rundown of the week.

0:13.6

Before we get into today's episode,

0:15.1

I do just want to take a minute

0:16.2

and give a special shout out to those of you

0:17.8

that have either taken the time to submit a review

0:20.7

or have shared the show with those around you.

0:23.0

It really means a lot that you take the time and do that

0:25.5

and express your appreciation in that way.

0:27.6

So thank you, thank you, thank you.

0:30.2

And without further ado, we can get right into today's stories.

0:35.0

It's a Thursday.

0:36.2

So we're of course starting off with some news out of the Supreme Court,

0:39.4

which released three opinions today.

0:41.9

Nothing too interesting, so we won't spend a ton of time here

0:45.3

but as always I like to let you know you know what the new law of the land is I think it's

0:50.0

important to talk about just so we're all aware. Two of the opinions were unanimous, one was

0:55.2

five to four. The first decision is in a case called Truck Insurance versus Kaiser Gypsum.

1:01.6

The question for the court here and this was a bankruptcy case, but the question was

1:06.2

whether an insurer that has financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a party of interest that may object to a plan of reorganization under the

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jordan Berman, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Jordan Berman and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.