Good evening. I'm Amman Navas and I'm Jeff Bennett on the news hour tonight. The

U.S. Supreme Court mistakenly posts a draft opinion signaling it may soon rule emergency abortions in Idaho are

legal for now.

As the trial of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gerschkovic begins, we take a look at what his detention says about Russia today.

And Judy Woodruff reports on the growing political divide within some Christian communities

as religious affiliation declines.

If you look at data and trust in institutions,

we don't trust anything today as much as we trusted it 40 years ago,

whether it be banks or unions or the media or religion. Welcome to the news hour. The US Supreme Court handed down two opinions today

but has left some of the most politically fraught cases for the final few days of its term.

One of those left undecided for now is focused on abortion and the future of a strict ban in Idaho.

We may have clues about how the justices will decide the case after a

document was mistakenly posted to the court website before being removed.

The copy of the yet-to-be- a six to three decision that would allow hospitals in the state to perform abortions to protect the life of the patient.

But it also leaves the heart of the case unresolved as the court appears poised to say the plaintiffs lack standing.

John Yang is here now to explain how the mistake happened and what it could mean for the court.

So John, let's start with that a document is

posted briefly on the website and then removed what do we know about what

happened well unlike the case that overturned Roe versus Wade two years ago this

does not appear to be a leak.

It appears to be a case of what they call fat thumbs.

Patricia McCabe, the court spokesperson,

...