This is an I-Heart podcast.

Guaranteed Human.

Crime Alert, hourly update. Breaking Crime News now.

I'm Sidney, a major development out of New York in the high-profile state murder trial of Luigi Mangione.

On Monday, a judge handed down a significant mixed ruling regarding what evidence can be presented to a jury.

Judge Gregory Caro ruled that prosecutors can indeed use a gun in a notebook, which has previously been described as a manifesto, as evidence in the upcoming trial.

This decision effectively rejects the defense team's argument that those specific items were

seized illegally, delivering a critical partial victory to the prosecution. However, Judge Carrow

ruled that prosecutors cannot admit several other items that were uncovered during the initial

search of Mangione's backpack when he was first arrested at a McDonald's restaurant in Pennsylvania

two years ago.

Those suppressed items include a loaded magazine, a cell phone, a passport, a wallet, and a

computer chip. Judge Caro explained that the arresting officers conducted what he called

an improper warrantless search at the McDonald's, specifically highlighting that the search

happened in plain view of the

public and the restaurant's employees. But the judge drew a clear line between that initial

encounter and what followed. He stated that a subsequent search of Mangione's backpack, which

was conducted at the Altoona Police headquarters, was entirely valid. Because the silencer and the

notebook were recovered later at the police station

during that valid search, the defense team's bid to suppress those specific items was officially

denied. Mangione's arrest came five days after Thompson, a 50-year-old father of two, was shot

dead outside a Manhattan hotel as he walked to an investors' conference. Police officers were eventually called to the

...