An hour to Sean Hannity Show, 841 Sean,

our number if you want to be a part of the program.

But we've gone over what was just complete utter

unmitigated shock in the trial the trial the sham trial of Donald Trump yesterday.

The biggest problem that the defense faces at this point is not that they've proven a thing they've proven nothing

absolutely nothing they've not even identified the law but to watch judge

Mershawn go at what is a legal expert, Bradley Smith, who understands the heart of the law that is supposedly the novel legal theory that the prosecution is putting on in this case and limit the ability of Judge Mershon to inform the jury that this is not a crime is pretty unbelievable.

Bradley Smith was on my TV show, specifically talking about this very issue.

He's a former FEC chair.

There's no violation at all in the NDA agreement that

although Trump is involved in that Michael Cohn told everybody in their

mother based on his own testimony yesterday and the testimony of Bob Costello before Congress.

I mean, not that they let him talk either.

Here's Bradley Smith, former FEC chair on my TV show.

The claim made by the DA is the federal law says something is a campaign contribution

if it's made for the purpose of influencing a campaign.

And that's the argument, well, they were trying to do this because they the for the purpose of influencing a campaign.

And that's the argument, well, they were trying to do this

because they thought if they could pay

hush money to Stormy Daniels,

that would help Trump's campaign.

So that's the theory.

...