meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Judge Halts Karen Read Pretrial Hearing After ‘Grave Concern’ Over New Information

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

News, News Commentary, True Crime

3.3908 Ratings

🗓️ 19 February 2025

⏱️ 27 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Judge Halts Karen Read Pretrial Hearing After ‘Grave Concern’ Over New Information

A pretrial hearing in the Karen Read case took an unexpected turn when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings, citing "grave concern" over newly disclosed information that could have "profound effects" on the defense. The dramatic moment unfolded after an open court discussion regarding federal involvement in the case, including expert witnesses from ARCCA, a forensic firm specializing in accident reconstruction.

“The Commonwealth just provided the court with information that causes me grave concern,” Cannone announced after returning from an unplanned recess. “The implications of that information may have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel.”

Cannone then suspended the hearing, stating that when proceedings resume, all affected parties should be "appropriately prepared" to address the issues at hand.

The abrupt decision followed a statement by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who disclosed in open court that Read’s defense team had previously communicated with ARCCA experts before her first trial. Brennan referred to what appeared to be emails between the defense and ARCCA, along with a $23,000 invoice the firm allegedly sent to Read’s legal team.

Brennan, who recently filed a motion to bar ARCCA witnesses from testifying at Read’s retrial, accused the defense of concealing critical information about the experts' involvement. “Both Dr. Wolfe and Dr. Rentschler admittedly did not review all pertinent and relevant evidence that exists in this case,” Brennan’s motion stated, referring to ARCCA’s accident reconstruction specialists who testified in Read’s defense in June 2024.

Tuesday’s pretrial hearing was the first since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied Read’s appeal to dismiss two of the three charges against her. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, with her Lexus SUV in January 2022 and leaving him to die outside in a snowstorm after a night of drinking.

Her original trial ended in a hung jury, leading Cannone to declare a mistrial in July 2024. Read, who has consistently maintained her innocence, claims that she was framed and that O’Keefe was actually killed inside the home of Brian Albert before being dragged outside.

In an exclusive interview with Boston 25’s Ted Daniel on Super Bowl Sunday, Read reiterated her stance, stating, “I have nothing to hide. I’ve been framed.”

Her retrial, originally scheduled for early 2025, has now been pushed to April. The latest developments raise new questions about the role of federal forensic experts in the case and how their testimony might impact the outcome of the upcoming trial.

#KarenRead #JusticeForKarenRead #BostonPD #LegalNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com


Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Murder in the Morning with Tony Bruske and Stacey Cole.

0:06.0

I don't think I've ever seen a judge as shaken as I've seen today.

0:13.4

Why was she so shaken?

0:16.9

What judge am I talking about?

0:18.9

The judge in this case, Judge Beverly Canoe in the Karen

0:23.5

Reed case, a hearing took place discussing many motions in the case, but it ended early as

0:30.9

judge said, I got to take some time here, literally shaking. How did we get here? Well, let me explain a little something

0:42.1

to you about witnesses in a case. And if you know this, great, but a lot of folks don't. I can

0:49.8

confess, I didn't know about this until I really started diving into true crime. So when you have a case and you have witnesses, each side can have their own witnesses.

0:59.0

And they have to disclose who those witnesses are and have to get approved and all that before they can come in and actually testify.

1:05.0

Sometimes the court itself or the state or the government brings in a witness to be helpful to both sides

1:13.5

and basically says, okay, this person is an expert, an expert witness, and we hear that a lot,

1:21.0

and each site can have their own expert witnesses. But this, here we're talking in this case is

1:26.1

about an expert witness in the Karen Reed trial about accident reconstruction.

1:31.1

Brought in basically to say, here's what we believe happened. Everybody do what you will based on the data that we're presenting to you.

1:41.0

This data doesn't lie. It's another thing when one of those two sides decides,

1:50.4

you know what? I think we're going to hire that witness and we're going to have them be an

1:59.4

expert witness for us on our side.

2:01.6

Now, if you were to disclose that and it would be approved, there's nothing wrong with that.

2:07.8

But if you don't disclose that and nobody is any the wiser and you've paid that witness

2:14.2

a lot of money and you've even coached that witness on what to say and how to say it

2:20.9

and the judge and the jury and the defense are none the wiser and they think this is just

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.