Ready?

I was born ready.

Welcome to advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isger. That's David French. We're going to talk about two cases today.

One on public accommodation laws and discrimination laws at the state, and another on First Amendment for First Graders.

See, first and first. It works out really well. Let me provide a little

warning, though, especially for those who are not already familiar with the en banc Korean spa case

that we're going to talk about. The first part of our conversation is going to be like every other

AO. If you've got kids in the car, please enjoy. When we go to that first commercial break,

if you have kids near you, we are going to be talking with language that you may not want your kids hearing. So after that

commercial break, feel free to put on headphones or wait until school drop-off has occurred.

And sorry about that, but there was no other way to talk about this without doing

that. So, we hope you enjoy. Now, all the traitors present, let's get started, shall we? From rags to riches.

I'm so sick of this. Working like a dog and being treated worse. Yorkshire to New York.

Poor climbers, you and me. A life dedicated

to revenge. Let's make this an occasion to remember. A woman of substance on Channel 4, stream now.

You know, David, on this podcast, we have spent a lot of time recently on the Fifth Circuit. And we have made the point, in fact, that

really one of the ways you can judge the Supreme Court is by which circuits they are granting

cert to, because, as we've noted, when the Supreme Court grants cert, it is likely to reverse

70% of the time. And so, in days of your when it was most likely to take ninth

circuit cases, you could think of the Supreme Court as having a more conservative bent, but of

late, it has been taking more Fifth Circuit cases from the most conservative court, and that that

maybe pushes back on the idea that it is coming from a

...