Behind the Night, the Surgery Podcast, relevant and engaging content designed listeners. It's Scott here. Want to talk a little bit about our

colorectal surgery oral board audio review. With upwards of 50 plus high-ield scenarios designed

for colorectal surgeons by colorectal surgeons, the scenarios are five to seven minutes long, a variety of tactics styles.

We also have a high-yield commentary to each scenario.

It includes tips and tricks that help you dominate the most challenging scenarios.

In addition to practical, easy to think through, easy to understand, teaching style that covers the most

confusing, the most interesting, and the most basic of topics that we all face as colorectal

surgeons. So we are confident that you will find this unique, dual format approach, highly

effective way to prepare for your test. Check it out, Behind theknife.org.

Welcome back to another episode of Behind the Knife. This is your hernia team from

Carolina's Medical Center coming at you with our final episode in this series. We very

much appreciate Behind the Knife's willing us to have us and hopefully share some ideas

with the listeners of Behind the Kn knife. So the topic that we're

going to discuss today is quality improvement in abdominal wall reconstruction. This is a journal

review episode and we're going to be touching on two papers, but can hopefully paint a larger

picture in terms of what quality improvement has meant to our group. So this episode is going to

emphasize why it's important to track your outcomes for patients and then use those outcomes to

better clinical care over time. The two papers that we're going to be discussing are open

prepared neovintral hernia repair, prospective observational outcomes of quality improvement over

18 years and 1842 patients, and then

implementation of penicillin allergy protocol and open abdominal wall reconstruction, a preoperative

optimization program. Both of those papers have been published within the last four years in

...