The So, How are you? Sorry listeners for if I don't make much sense this morning I will do my best I I tell you what

basically what we're gonna have to do is you're gonna have to have 70% possession I'll just

park the bus and try and hit one on the counter attack. Yeah, Arson Bengal was asked a journalist at Wembley after the Cup semi-final.

What was the score at Stamford Bridge and the reply was 1-Nel to Chelsea?

He said, the usual then.

So you not make it much sense, it's the usual then so you not making much sense. It's the usual then. Oh, cruel.

Banta. Early morning banter.

Yeah. What do you make of this? Because there's kind of two scores of thought. One is that United completely dominated that match.

70 odd percent possession, 15 shots, and Chelsea just parked the bus at home to the Champions Elects, and how sad it is that the Champions Elect

feel the need to do that, or how positive it is

for United that we're now that good.

That's one school of thought.

The other school of thought is, I'm struggling to remember a time that

court-to-war really had to make a difficult save and for all that possession it just wasn't that effective.

Where are you on this one? I think as is almost always the truth lies somewhere in between because from my perspective the very good

news about that game was that the system clearly works and that players can clearly play the system.

And the bad news about that game is if you take certain key pieces out of that system, then

it's going to be considerably less effective because basically if someone had

been playing where Rooney was and Rooney had been playing with Falcow was I can't imagine

it would have been quite as ineffective as it was.

Yeah someone being Michael

Karick and so I mean a key cog right massive difference if Rooney had been

...