meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate's Spoiler Specials

Joker

Slate's Spoiler Specials

Slate Podcasts

Film Reviews,, Tv & Film

3.6724 Ratings

🗓️ 4 October 2019

⏱️ 57 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On the Spoiler Special podcast, Slate critics discuss movies, the occasional TV show, and, once in a blue moon, another podcast, in full spoiler-filled detail. This week, Dana Stevens, Forrest Wickman and Sam Adams discuss Joker. Though this bleak origin story is a departure from the traditional DC superhero movies, Arthur Fleck’s (Joaquin Phoenix) descent from mentally ill clown to murderous villain is clichéd and uncomfortable to watch. But is it just one bad day that leads Arthur down this path? Or is it a consequence of broken system failing to help someone in need?


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening ad-free on Amazon Music.

0:03.6

I want to tell you my secret now.

0:06.4

I see dead people.

0:09.5

Silent green is people.

0:13.3

No, I am the father.

0:16.7

Oh, Rushburn.

0:23.6

What's in the box? You made it!

0:27.0

You blew it up!

0:28.6

Damn you all the hell!

0:32.9

Hi, welcome to this late spoiler special podcast.

0:35.7

We are here today to spoil Joker, the new movie from Todd Phillips, giving us the origin story of the infamous green-haired Batman villain, played by Joaquin Phoenix.

0:44.6

Joining me in the Slate Studios, we're all here together, which is nice, is Forrest Wickman, Slate's Culture Editor. Hello.

0:50.2

Hey, Dana. And Sam, welcome.

0:52.3

Hello. Thanks for coming in.

1:14.2

Okay, so as usual, I like to start these by going around the table asking just for a very brief reaction so people know whether we love or hate it going in. I was thinking about the reason I do that. And I think basically it's because I don't want this to feel like we're reviewing the movie. I want this to feel like we all wrote reviews. Like pretend that we all wrote our reviews and they're up there and people can know our basic argument and we're kind of hashing out stuff we didn't get,

1:19.4

spoiling, et cetera. Anyway, so starting with you, Sam, thumbs up, thumbs down, send your friends or drive your friends away. I hoved it. I elated it. It's hard for me to decide. Like, I am not sorry. I watched it. It is interesting. I think it is maybe, you know, not as, well, definitely not as smart as it thinks it is. It's probably important in what it reflects, although I don't know how much it knows what it's important about. So thumb very much sideways. Okay, yeah. Or are we making it important by talking about it? We can get to that, too. Forrest, what about you? You were in my screening last night, I bet we didn't get to talk after. Yeah, I sort of expected I might be coming on here as the Joker Defender. I think I would have happily been, for example, the Dark Night

2:01.9

defender. Like, I was in college when Dark Night came out. I'm a sometime defender of that movie

2:06.9

and sometimes those types of movies. And I really did not like this movie. I found it even just

2:14.5

boring for most of the first two-thirds, I would say. I found it neither

2:20.8

insightful nor entertaining. And, you know, I think it works best as a showcase for Joaquin

2:26.7

Phoenix. And in that respect, I think that's just a kind of movie that I find myself not as

2:30.8

interested in. I'm not interested in movies that are primarily showcases

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.