Johnny Depp v Amber Heard: "JUROR IMPERSONATOR?"
Crime Stories with Nancy Grace
iHeartPodcasts and CrimeOnline
4.2 • 8.1K Ratings
🗓️ 11 July 2022
⏱️ 41 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Amber Heard’s legal team claims a person not called to jury duty was inadvertently seated on the jury for Johnny Depp's defamation lawsuit, and that warrants a new trial. At issue is juror number 15. Heard's legal team says a 52-year-old man responded to a jury summons and was seated on the jury, but the summons was for a 77-year-old man with the same last name living at the same address.
Joining Nancy Grace Today:
- Darryl Cohen - Former Assistant District Attorney, Fulton County, Georgia, Defense Attorney, Cohen, Cooper, Estep, & Allen, LLC, CCEAlaw.com
- Caryn Stark - NYC Psychologist, CarynStark.com, Twitter: @carynpsych, Facebook: "Caryn Stark"
- John Guard - Chief Deputy – Pitt County Sheriff’s Office (Greenville, NC), Specializes in Investigating Domestic Violence Cases
- Charlie Lankston - FeMail Editor, DailyMail.com, Twitter/Instagram:@charlielanks
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Crime Stories with Nancy Grace |
| 0:08.6 | Does it never end with this woman? |
| 0:19.7 | Amber Hurn is back in the headlines this time suggesting that a juror impersonated |
| 0:29.2 | someone else, a juror that sat on the dip, heard trial. |
| 0:35.1 | Long shot? |
| 0:36.1 | Yeah, possible? |
| 0:39.8 | Could there be a mistrial? |
| 0:41.8 | Absolutely. |
| 0:42.8 | I'm Nancy Grace, this is Crime Stories. |
| 0:45.1 | Thank you for being with us here at Fox Nation and Series XM111. |
| 0:49.2 | First of all, take a listen to our friends at ABC. |
| 0:51.8 | Amber Hurn's legal team filing a motion for a mistrial and the defamation case between |
| 0:56.5 | her and her ex-husband Johnny Depp. |
| 0:58.8 | Her lawyers alleging that juror number 15 was illegally selected. |
| 1:03.2 | Writing juror number 15 was not the individual summon for jury duty on April 11, 2022, and |
| 1:09.5 | therefore is not part of the jury panel and could not have properly served on the jury at |
| 1:13.9 | this trial. |
| 1:14.9 | The request for a new trial is on the basis that juror 15 is 52 years old, born in 1970, |
| 1:21.6 | while the person summoned, living at the same address with the same name was born in 1945 |
| 1:27.0 | and would have been 77 years old at the time of the trial. |
| 1:30.2 | It's a very tough decision for the court to make on this motion, and it's hard to see |
| 1:34.4 | how the fact that someone was 52 years old rather than 70 years old, how that would make |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from iHeartPodcasts and CrimeOnline, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of iHeartPodcasts and CrimeOnline and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.