Johnny Depp v Amber Heard #57 to #59 - Your Questions

Psychology In Seattle Podcast

Kirk Honda

Mental Health, Health & Fitness

4.6 • 1.2K Ratings

🗓️ 12 July 2022

⏱️ 94 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dr Kirk Honda answers your questions regarding the trial.

Get up to 16 free meals from Hello Fresh here: http://www.HelloFresh.com/Seattle16 (or use the promo code Seattle16 at checkout)

Need a therapist? Try BetterHelp! https://www.betterhelp.com/KIRK
Get started today and enjoy 10% off your first month. Discount code “KIRK" will be automatically applied.

Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle
Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact
Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle
Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/
Discord: https://discord.gg/6QR4sE8x9K
Reddit (run by fans): https://www.reddit.com/r/PsychologyInSeattle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PsychInSeattle
Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/
Facebook Fan Page (run by fans): https://www.facebook.com/groups/112633189213033
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.honda

The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®

Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.

Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/3269717/advertisement

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hey server listeners, I recently sent out a survey asking for you all to submit your questions to
0:04.3	me regarding the Johnny Depp Amber herd trial. So I thought I would answer your questions today.
0:09.6	I usually do this whenever I do a deep dive and at the final phase I will ask for questions and I
0:16.2	will answer them to the best of my ability. And I do consider the trial to be kind of a deep dive.
0:21.6	I mean, I yammered for 50 hours on the internet. So if that doesn't constitute a deep dive,
0:26.3	I don't know what does. I also asked for y'all to tell me if you thought the verdict was fair or
0:33.7	not, about 75% believe that the trial verdict was fair or sort of fair. And 10% said no, it was not
0:42.4	fair and 14% said they don't know if it's fair. All right, so I thought I would start with the
0:48.0	questions that were submitted to the non-patrion link. And then I thought I would make the
0:53.2	Patreon link questions for patrons only kind of make sense, but I'll do that later.
0:57.2	So this first question is from Ellie from Victoria, Canada. Throughout the entire trial,
1:02.0	I was often frustrated by my peers black and white opinions on the trial rather than considering
1:06.9	all the evidence. Would you consider this kind of a confirmation bias or is there another
1:12.4	psych term that fits this type of thinking in criminality or civil cases end of question? Yeah,
1:19.4	definitely confirmation bias is a part of it. I'm going to go through a bunch of other cognitive
1:24.4	biases. I thought it'd be a good way to kind of start off this episode. So confirmation bias
1:29.6	means that we tend to regard information that confirms our belief system as true and valid,
1:38.7	and when we have information that contradicts our belief system or our conclusions or our initial
1:44.4	conclusions or our actual reactions, we tend to disregard it. So clearly that was happening.
1:50.0	All of us are doing that. I was doing that. You were doing that. We can't get away from that.
1:54.4	So if you came to a conclusion at some point or even before the trial began, an information came
2:00.8	in that confirmed your conclusion, then you would say, ah, for example, if you came in pro-amber heard,
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kirk Honda, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Kirk Honda and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.