He replied, yes. Jim Jordan. He's the first one to publicly come out and say, yep, he'll

run to be the next house speaker. Well, I mean, look, there are some people who are

elated about that. My question is going to be the same thing it was with McCarthy. What

do you plan to do about federal spending? What tools are you willing to use to fix it?

If you're not willing to shut the federal government down to fix the spending, then you're

not going to solve it. I mean, we can all, it's like, remember in those adventure novels

you used to read, do they have those when you were a kid, like in the 30s? Did they have

those novels to go down the cave? Turn to page 37. We can go ahead and skip three or four

steps in the adventure novel and just get to the very end, which is, are you willing

to shut down the federal government to fix spending? If the answer is no, then you're

not going to fix it that I am against you. If you are willing to do that, then tell me

more, I'm willing to hear. Okay. So Jim Jordan, one of the names that's being tossed around,

what about Steve Scalise? Number two, Republicans, same, same thing. You've also got the house

majority whip, Tom Emmer of Minnesota. His name is being kicked around. I'm not sure, Casey,

how you can, I can support someone though who supported Kevin McCarthy. Because clearly,

your vote is your voice, your vote is your consent. It's widely, most of my ballot blank when I

go into vote each time because my vote is the consent or the support of the people running.

I'm not for, I never vote on something just because well, I got a vote for one of these two people.

No, leaving it blank as my statement of I'm not consenting to what I know you will, will be.

I'm not supporting that. I'm not sure, even though Jim Jordan has a great track record of saying

nice things. Well, how is he really any different than Jim Banks? He voted for Kevin McCarthy.

He was an ardent supporter of Kevin McCarthy, essentially from the get go.

...