meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

Jeremy Hunt’s low-key Budget

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Daily News, Politics

4.42.2K Ratings

🗓️ 6 March 2024

⏱️ 22 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Jeremy Hunt said the government would cut National Insurance by 2 per cent, would abolish the non-dom tax status and would raise the threshold for child benefits in his Budget today. To discuss the new measures, Katy Balls speaks to Kate Andrews and David Miles, from the Office for Budget Responsibility.

Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.


For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.


Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is sponsored by Canacord Genuity Wealth Management,

0:03.6

Experience Wealth Managers who go above and beyond to guide and support you.

0:08.0

Can-do is more than just an attitude.

0:10.0

It's navigating today for a brighter tomorrow.

0:13.3

Visit can do wealth.com.

0:15.6

Hello and welcome to coffee-hairs shots.

0:22.0

I'm Katie Balls, I'm drawn by David Miles from the Office

0:24.8

Budget Responsibility and Kate Andrews the economics editor The Spectator and we are going to talk

0:30.5

about the spring budget.

0:33.0

Okay, let's kick off, I think, with the main measures.

0:36.9

There is lots of talk in advance about national insurance

0:39.6

or income tax, or perhaps both.

0:41.5

What do we get? We got another to pee off employee national

0:45.5

insurance if you combine that with the measures in the autumn statement

0:49.2

this brings it from 12% down to 8%.

0:53.4

He's offered up today another 10 billion pound tax cut,

0:56.3

but this was not exactly news,

0:57.8

as it was widely expected as of yesterday,

0:59.8

really the past few days that national insurance

1:01.8

is what the chancellor would go for, not least because

1:04.0

it was the cheaper option to income tax. A penny off income tax would have required a 7 billion

1:08.4

pound cut, whereas a penny off national insurance required a 5 billion pound cut. We also had if there was

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.