Jeremy Farrar and the WHO with Johnny Vedmore
Unlimited Hangout with Whitney Webb
Whitney Webb
4.9 • 1.2K Ratings
🗓️ 20 January 2023
⏱️ 101 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
In this episode, Whitney talks to Johnny Vedmore about the imminent appointment of former Wellcome Trust head Jeremy Farrar to be the World Health Organization's Chief Scientist and how it relates to the WHO's attempts to obtain new powers through a secretive regulation amendment process.
Originally published 01/17/23.
Follow Johnny Vedmore:
johnnyvedmore.com
Fungimonkey.com
Read Johnny's latest article on Unlimited Hangout. Guido Goldman, the CFR and the German Marshall Fund
- Get early access to podcasts by becoming an Unlimited Hangout member.
- Find previous episodes on all podcast platforms
- Order Whitney’s book One Nation Under Blackmail.
- Sign up for the weekly newsletter to receive updates on the book, new articles, podcasts, and interviews.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | You're listening to Unlimited Hangout and your host, Annie Webb. |
| 0:05.4 | Last month, the World Health Organization quietly announced that it would soon appoint a new chief scientist in 2023, a man named Jeremy Ferrar. |
| 0:15.0 | As part of its press release on Ferrar's imminent appointment, the Who, stated that Farrar will be focused on, quote, bringing together the best brains and science and innovation from around the world to develop and deliver high-quality health services to the people who need the most, no matter who they are and where they live. |
| 0:34.5 | However, Ferrar's history and his recent role as head of the Welcome Trust suggests |
| 0:39.2 | that Farrar's appointment to a top post at the Who bodes poorly for global health and is instead |
| 0:45.4 | suggestive of Who ambitions to become a supranational organization that promotes the interests of |
| 0:51.5 | big pharma and increasingly big tech to the detriment of public health. |
| 0:55.8 | The announcement of Farrar's appointment comes at an interesting time for the HOO, as the organization is currently involved in secret negotiations to amend the international health regulations. |
| 1:06.5 | Those amendments, if approved by WHO member states, would give the WHO unprecedented power to declare a |
| 1:12.1 | public health emergency and also to dictate to member states what measures they must implement |
| 1:17.5 | as a result of that emergency. It would also establish a framework to normalize an entrench vaccine |
| 1:23.8 | passports and other biosecurity surveillance practices, while also exempting these |
| 1:28.1 | regulations from respecting human rights and the fundamental freedoms of the populations of who |
| 1:32.8 | member states. With such unprecedented power, a man like Jeremy Ferrar, who has consistently |
| 1:37.7 | supported unscientific biosecurity measures throughout the COVID crisis, would be able to dictate |
| 1:43.2 | to most of the world what public health policies must be implemented and win. |
| 1:48.0 | Adding to these issues is the recent pandemic simulation hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, |
| 1:54.0 | which previously hosted controversial simulations, including 2001's Dark Winter in 2019's Event 201. |
| 2:07.3 | This new simulation called catastrophic contagion focused largely on Africa and on the whose role in shaping global and regional pandemic responses, it of course included considerable |
| 2:12.5 | involvement from Bill Gates, whose foundation wields a significant and troubling amount of |
| 2:16.9 | influence over |
| 2:17.8 | world health organization policy. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Whitney Webb, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Whitney Webb and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

