You're listening to the Judicial Watch weekly update with Tom Fitton.

Hey everyone, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton here with our weekly update on social media.

Thanks for joining us.

One of the most important weekly updates you'll hear from me.

It's the announcement. I'm honored to announce that the

Supreme Court of the United States agreed with Judicial Watch. We won 7-2 before the high court

on a very important election integrity issue. The question of whether candidates have the right to challenge election

rules in federal court, have standing to challenge. In this case, we represent Mike Boss,

Congressman from Illinois, two presidential electors who technically were federal candidates

as well, who are challenging Illinois's law that allowed the counting of ballots

that arrived for up to two weeks after election day.

That means ballots could be as late as 14 days after election day and still get counted.

Now federal law sets an election day, not an election week, not an election month, but the

court didn't want to get at the merits.

They said a candidate didn't have standing to challenge this.

And they said, well, he was going to win anyway.

We're like, well, that's ridiculous because he has a right to an accurate count.

He has an inherent right to challenge unlawful election rules on making him, for instance, spend money and time and effort and

concern and anxiety related to the counting of ballots that occur after election day.

And the Supreme Court agreed with us completely and came up and concluded, really affirmed what has been the law prior, frankly,

the 2020, that candidates have a broad standing right in federal court. Again, it was 7-2.

It was five votes in favor of the broadest possible standing, two votes in favor of a narrow standing,

...