Hello and welcome back to SoTriology 101.

I went back to the old intro for those who have been requesting it so that you can still hear the old song that some of you have been addicted to for some time now because you've heard it so many times.

So you're welcome while you're there in quarantine in your house like the rest of us.

I just pray that that will help encourage you all the more.

And today we're going to respond to Dr. James White, as most recent broadcast, where he does a

critique of provisionism as well as a specific Ken Wilson's book. And what you're going to notice here

are some of the things we've already drawn attention to, like the gaslighting techniques that are

oftentimes used by Dr. White, unfortunately,

where he'll use words like stunning. I wrote these down, zealous. Of course, of course,

Pelagian is always thrown in there. Horrific, strange, polemical, these kinds of words. And it's just

ironic, as Dr. Wagner pointed out in our last Google Hangout that we kind of did all together, is that James White seems to think if it's polemic, therefore it can't be scholarly.

Therefore, James White sees the irony of that because almost everything he does is a polemic against what other people in the church believe.

And therefore, it must also be unscholarly.

To say something is polemic, therefore it must be unscholarly, is to call your entire ministry,

James White, unscholarly. And to dismiss Wilson's view because you felt it was too polemic,

seems to be irony of all ironies. And also calling it bias in one-sided again, seems very ironic to us, because to you, it seems biased in one-sided again seems very ironic to us because to you it seems biased

one-sided because you are on the extreme opposite side and so dismissing kin's work based upon

your bias is obviously just bias in and of itself instead of looking at the historical facts of the

matter now he does continue to say he's eventually going to get to the actual quotes he's eventually just bias in and of itself instead of looking at the historical facts of the matter. Now,

he does continue to say he's eventually going to get to the actual quotes. He's eventually going to get to those things. But this is the third podcast he's done, broadcast he's done, talking

about Ken's book, and we still have not seen any real substance yet. And he gets on to me about

being a little bit long and taking a long time to get things.

...