The following podcast contains advertising to access an ad-free version of the LawFair

podcast become a material supporter of LawFair at patreon.com slash LawFair.

That's patreon.com slash LawFair.

Also, check out LawFair's other podcast offerings, rational security, chatter, LawFair

no bull and the aftermath.

A particularly disturbing detail in the report is this individual's creation of a

Facebook album prior to the terror attack itself, which had a bunch of right-wing

videos in it, but also had a Photoshopped image of one of the ultimate targets

in the terror attack on fire.

It begs the question why, you know, why did more red flags or the right red flags

not go up.

I'm Benjamin Whittes and this is the LawFair podcast April 5th, 2021.

Two years ago, a gunman opened fire at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, killing dozens

of innocent people.

And last December, the government of New Zealand issued a giant report on the subject.

Yes, we're a bit late to discussing this report, but it took a while to read it, it being

more than 700 pages.

The other day on LawFair, LawFair's associate editor Jacob Schultz and Justin Sherman

of the Atlantic Council wrote a lengthy piece analyzing the report's discussion of the

shooter's use of the internet.

It's a particularly detailed catalog of how one user of the internet used it to radicalize

it, to threaten people, to celebrate racist celebrities, and to marinate in the soup

...