Today on Seculow, Jack Smith seeks another delay in the Trump January 6th case.

Keeping you informed and engaged.

Now more than ever, This is Seculo.

We want to hear from you.

Share and post your comments for call 1-800, 684, 3,110.

And now your host, Jordan Secullo.

All right folks, welcome to Secullo.

Remember, initially it was Jack Smith who wanted to rush a case

to the US Supreme Court on whether or not

President Trump had any post-presidential immunity from acts that were taken during

his presidency. The Supreme Court said no no ultimately the case got to the US

Supreme Court and when it did it was a blow to Jack Smith but there was a different

case brought initially remember by one of the January 6, those who were in prison, found guilty,

and he challenged one of his charges, and that was the charge that it was an obstruction of an official

proceeding, and the Supreme Court found that that was not in fact what that meant under the law so that a protest would not be an obstruction of an official proceeding and this was someone who actually entered in to the

capital so they are still I don't know if they're still in prison but they were

still found guilty on other charges that they were not successful in appealing on, but the Supreme Court tossed that charge.

While two of the four charges Jack Smith brought in Washington, D.C. against Donald Trump would be thrown out then under that theory.

The first is a lesser obstruction, which is a conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding,

which of course you can't be part of if the act itself speaking at the

rally is not the obstruction of an official proceeding. So you take two out what

are you left with?

...