J.K. Rowling – Part Two – Transparent

Origin Story

Podmasters

Society & Culture, History, News, News Commentary

4.7 • 811 Ratings

🗓️ 27 May 2026

⏱️ 85 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Welcome back to Origin Story and part two of the story of J.K. Rowling. In this episode we turn away from her life story towards her public statements and the information she is consuming. In 2020, Rowling publishes her first full-length statement about her gender-critical beliefs and it becomes her defining issue. We unpack some of the phrases she uses and the books she is reading and we explore what the science says about key issues: safety in trans-inclusive spaces, trans women (and women with Differences in Sex Development) in sports, and healthcare provision for gender-questioning youth. Since 2018 trans people in the UK have faced an enormous backlash: rising prejudice, restricted healthcare, political abandonment and obsessive media hostility. And Rowling has put herself in the forefront. Her tone has become more aggressive and her activism more overt, accelerated by Scotland’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill. So when HBO announced its ambitious new Harry Potter TV series last year, in the midst of the Trump administration’s war on trans Americans and the UK Supreme Court’s explosive ruling on gender identity, it became a battleground. It’s hard to separate the art from the artist when supporting the art means funding the artist’s activism. How did Rowling move from the appearance of moderation to explicit militancy and how does that align with her professed values? Are her arguments supported by the research? How did anti-trans sentiment go mainstream so quickly? What are the ethics of continuing to consume Rowling’s work? And is the viciousness of right-wing transphobia causing some people to think twice about the consequences of their beliefs? • Support Origin Story on Patreon • Buy the Origin Stories books on Centrism, Fascism and Conspiracy Theory • Subscribe to Origin Story on YouTube Reading list Articles • O. Rose Broderick – ‘Evidence Undermines “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” Claims’, Scientific American (24 August 2023) • Cass Review: Final Report (2024)• Christina Cauterucci – ‘Impeccable Timing, Pamela Paul!’, Slate (16 February 2023) • Theara Coleman – ‘A timeline of JK Rowling’s anti-trans shift’, The Week US (April 2026) • Matt Craig – ‘J.K. Rowling is a Billionaire — Again’, Forbes (30 May 2025) • Laura Dattaro – ‘Largest study to date confirms overlap between autism and gender diversity’, The Transmitter (14 September 2020) • Caroline Davies – ‘JK Rowling’s journey from Harry Potter creator to gender-critical campaigner’, Guardian (18 April 2025) • Sarah Ditum et al. – ‘An Oral History of the Gender War’, The Radical Notion (Autumn/Winter 2024) • Alona Ferber – ‘Judith Butler on the culture wars, JK Rowling and living in “anti-intellectual times”’, New Statesman (22 September 2020) • Molly Fischer – ‘Who Did J.K. Rowling Become?’, The Cut (22 December 2020) • Amelia Hansford – ‘JK Rowling sets up “women’s fund” to support gender-critical legal cases’, Pink News (26 May 2025) • Nick Hilton – ‘JK Rowling, Britain’s gloriously nasty novelist’, New Statesman (15 January 2024) • Katherine J. Igoe – ‘JK Rowling’s Under-the-Radar Book Series Gives a Clear Picture of Her Beliefs’, Marie Claire (5 August 2020) • Jessica Kant – ‘Anatomy of a Moral Panic’, jessk.org (3 February 2024) • Jessica Kant – ‘Welcome to the anti-trans outrage factory’, jessk.org (8 February 2026) • Alice McCool – ‘How the US Christian Right and Anti-Abortion Lobbyists are Reshaping NHS Policy’, Byline Times (2 April 2026) • Parker Molloy – ‘The IOC’s New Policy Isn’t Really a Trans Story’, The Present Age (26 March 2026) ... Reading list continues on Patreon Written and presented by Ian Dunt and Dorian Lynskey. Producer: Simon Williams. Videographer: Connor Newson. Music by Jade Bailey. Art by Jim Parrett. Logo by Mischa Welsh. Group Editor: Andrew Harrison. Origin Story is a Podmasters production www.podmasters.co.uk Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	The following podcast was recorded before the EHRC guidance was published on the 21st of May, 20 to origin story.
0:38.7	It's the show where we take an idea, person, event or institution from history, explain its origins and discuss how it influences how we talk about politics.
0:46.7	I'm Doreenlinsky.
0:47.8	And I'm Ian Dunn.
0:49.1	So this is part two of the story of J.K. Rowling and her transformation from widely beloved author to divisive anti-trans activist.
1:00.5	We left this last time with this sort of crucial tweet in 2019, where she comes out of the closet, so to speak, with her gender critical views and mayhem ensues.
1:15.1	But this is only the beginning.
1:18.5	So we're now in June 2020.
1:22.4	Yeah, we are.
1:23.9	So she posts a link to an article,
1:25.6	headlined creating a more equal post-COovid 19 World for people who menstruate.
1:31.4	Her comments are, people who menstruate, I'm sure there used to be a word for those people.
1:35.5	Someone help me out.
1:36.4	Wambun, wimped, womand, if sex isn't real, the lived reality of women globally is erased.
1:42.2	I know in love trans people, this kind of language will soon disappear. I know in love trans people, this kind of language will soon
1:45.2	disappear. I know in love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability
1:49.8	of so many to meaningfully discuss their lives. Now, I read this article, which refers to girls,
1:57.4	women, and all people who menstruate. Right. So the headline, obviously, it meant something else, but it suggests that if she'd read it, she would have realized that it does not replace terms girls, women. Yeah. And similarly, you'll probably have come across people complaining about words like chest feeding and cervix have her. I tried to find the original sources for these, and I couldn't because everything was just... Her comment on her. No, just everyone else's comments. Right, right. Yeah. I'm not saying these words have never been used, presumably they were, but the idea that they've been widely used as a replacement for women is not true. Yes, although, you know, the headline is always... Of course.
2:34.5	Bad headline.
2:35.2	But look at how effective and reasonable she is at this point, right?
2:38.6	Like, she's focusing as you want to, if you're involved in a political campaign,
2:44.3	on the sort of like the most absurd elements on the other side, right?
	...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 20 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Podmasters, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Podmasters and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.