Isabel Hardman's Sunday Roundup - 12/05/24
Coffee House Shots
The Spectator
4.4 • 2.2K Ratings
🗓️ 12 May 2024
⏱️ 14 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Natalie Elphicke's defection to Labour is another blow to the Tories, but could she prove more trouble than she's worth for Starmer? David Cameron says the UK will continue to provide arms to Israel, but Labour disagrees. And as Russian attacks gather pace in Ukraine, Cameron says Ukraine's allies will prevail if they work together.
Produced by Joe Bedell-Brill.
Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.
For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.
Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello and welcome to Coffey House shots The Spectators Daily Politics Podcast. |
| 0:13.7 | I'm Isabel Hardman and this is the Sunday roundup. |
| 0:17.6 | Natalie Alphick's dramatic defection to Labour had already caused quite a bit of controversy |
| 0:21.7 | this week with many in the |
| 0:23.0 | Labour Party feeling she should not have been welcome given her position on the |
| 0:27.6 | right of the Conservative Party. Now there could be more trouble for Kiestama |
| 0:32.0 | after the Sunday Times reported that |
| 0:34.0 | Elphic may have lobbied the then Justice Secretary Robert Buckland |
| 0:38.2 | over her husband's trial on sexual assault charges in 2020. |
| 0:46.3 | Speaking to Labor Front Benchar Jonathan Ashworth on the BBC, Laura Coonsburg asked if Elphick should be investigated. |
| 0:49.8 | The Sunday Times this morning has reported that you're a new MP Natalie Elfick who last week joined |
| 0:55.4 | your ranks as being accused of lobbying the then Justice Secretary about her husband's |
| 0:59.5 | court case. |
| 1:01.0 | Should that be investigated? |
| 1:02.0 | Well she says it's nonsense. |
| 1:04.0 | It's not in her interpretation of events. |
| 1:06.0 | I don't understand if why the Lord Chancellor at the time did not raise this |
| 1:10.0 | and why he's raising it now, but she says it's not in her interpretation of the |
| 1:15.5 | of that discussion. Should it be investigated just to make sure that it was all absolutely |
| 1:19.3 | above board because either she isn't telling the truth or Robert Buckland who is a |
| 1:23.5 | Casey and who was the Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor isn't telling the truth. |
| 1:26.8 | Well look she said it is not her interpretation she says it is it is nonsense I wasn't there weren't there. I mean look if Robert Buckland has got |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

