I'm Bill Moyers. It's good to have your ear.

Is the Supreme Court out of step with the 21st century?

Two of our best watchers of the Supreme Court assess how its recent decisions affect everything

from privacy and women's rights to public unions and corporate power.

Doja Lithwick?

You cannot look at the Roberts Court and say that they've done anything other than

systemically unravel.

Voting rights, women's rights, workers' rights, environmental progress.

It's a pretty palpable and unequivocal trend.

And Linda Greenhouse.

I think it's hard for anybody looking at this court objectively to come away, not thinking

that it's a court in pursuit of an agenda.

Thanks for joining us.

If you had trouble sorting through the blizzard of decisions released by the Supreme Court,

led by Chief Justice John Roberts, you've come to the right place.

Two of the most knowledgeable court watchers in journalism are here to help decode the implications

of those five to four rulings on public prayer, organized labor, campaign finance reform,

and the Hobby Lobby case.

That's the decision that certain companies own religious grounds do not have to provide health

insurance for some forms of birth control. Linda Greenhouse covered the Supreme Court for the New York

Times for 30 years and still writes a bi-weekly column for that paper.

She's a lecturer, as well as the Knight Distinguished Journalist in Residence at the Yale Law School.

...