Which team has a better roster? Chiefs are Eagles. We decide. Old Miss quarterback Jackson Darts climbing up in the NFL draft boards, and we discuss whether or not the Pro Bowl should be totally eliminated. Check it out on a more on a Flaming Dragon Friday here at Crane & Company. Hey, everybody listening out there.

Hope you are ready to have a fantastic weekend.

However you listen to out there, hope you are ready to have a fantastic weekend.

However you listen to us, it doesn't matter. Just leave us a five-star review if you got time

and make sure you're subscribed to the show. In football, 90% or more of the time, the team with the

better roster's going to win. Just the truth. That's why it's the ultimate team sport and why roster

construction and stability is one of the most important things that a coach must focus on.

But if there's one team that has consistently defied losing to superior rosters, it's the Kansas

City Chiefs. And don't get it twisted. I'm not saying the Chiefs don't have a really good

roster because they do, but ask yourself this, is their overall roster better than what the Eagles have?

I don't think so, we're going to discuss in a second. Is their overall roster better than the Ravens?

Probably not. And when healthy, you can make a case that the Lions have a better overall roster

as well as a couple other teams.

But the Chiefs do have that special clutch sauce.

They have that secret blend of herbs and spices.

And it seems every time it gets tight or their backs against the wall, they find a way to win.

They've done it with star players and nobodies.

They've developed draft picks and hit it right in free agency.

Even when the

opponent plays clean, the Chiefs find a way to win. After all, there are two opponents so far in

the playoffs and both outgain't gain them and not turn the ball over, yet they still lost. Plainly put,

Kansas City does more with less than anyone else in the league, and I think the bills are a

...