Is No. 10 trying to ban strikes?
Coffee House Shots
The Spectator
4.4 • 2.2K Ratings
🗓️ 10 January 2023
⏱️ 13 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
James Heale speaks to Katy Balls and Isabel Hardman.
Produced by Natasha Feroze.
Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.
For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.
Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This episode is sponsored by Canacord Genuity Wealth Management. |
| 0:04.0 | Experienced Wealth planners and investment managers who offer unwavering support in challenging times. |
| 0:09.8 | Visit kanduwealth.com for more information. |
| 0:16.4 | Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots. |
| 0:18.0 | I'm James Hill and I'm joined today by Isabel Harman and Katie Bulls. |
| 0:21.8 | A first light on the agenda in which has been dominating the House of Commons this afternoon |
| 0:25.6 | are the government's plans to introduce minimum service levels in six key industries. |
| 0:29.5 | Grant Shouts with a dispatch box facing the off against Andrew Rainer. |
| 0:32.6 | Isabel, talk us through these proposals and why they're being introduced now. |
| 0:37.2 | So this is a very political piece of legislation both for the Conservatives and for Labour. |
| 0:44.2 | Labour have called it the sack the nurses bill because it basically in blue light areas, |
| 0:51.1 | in blue light areas of work. So ambulances, fire service and so on would require unions to |
| 0:58.0 | guarantee minimum service levels and in other sectors for there to be voluntary agreements in place. |
| 1:05.8 | Not to minimise the impact of strikes the Conservatives argue but just to ensure that there is |
| 1:11.7 | basic safety and that's the way they're framing it. So Grant Shouts frames it as it's amazing that |
| 1:17.2 | the Labour Party doesn't want to ensure that lives are safe when there's a strike on and we're not |
| 1:23.5 | blocking the right to strike. The way Labour is characterising it is that because part of this is |
| 1:28.9 | also that if the unions don't guarantee those minimum service levels then they could face legal |
| 1:34.8 | action they could be sued. And so Labour is saying not only does this kind of the right to strike |
| 1:40.1 | it also puts people's jobs at risk and how is this going to help sectors such as health care |
| 1:45.8 | which are facing workforce crises if you put even more jobs at risk. It's obviously a way |
| 1:51.8 | of bringing the Conservative Party back together after a bruising year and a bit because it's |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

