For the one minute look at culture from a Christian worldview, I'm John Stone Street with a point.

As if we needed another troubling social media trend, some are now experimenting with what's called

microcheating and one popular microcheating game partners create hypothetical romantic and sexual situations

and then ask each other of certain actions like wearing another guy's sweater or paying for a female

co-worker's meal should be considered cheating.

Defenders of the game claim that it helps partners communicate more clearly

about expectations and boundaries and relationships.

But in practice, well, you might guess what can happen.

Not to mention, the game reduces infidelity to actions

instead of intentions.

Arguing about where the line is,

between cheating and not cheating

ignores the possibility that the line itself is the problem.

Just another version of the wrong question asked by millions of Christian teenagers throughout

the years.

How far is too far?

It's the wrong question because fidelity's not a line. It's a direction. Actions matter of course,

but as Jesus introduced to the world, so do our motives, our attitudes, and our intentions.

For the Golson Center, I'm John Stone Street.