Is HR 1 an existential threat to American democracy?
Americano
The Spectator
4.0 • 762 Ratings
🗓️ 4 March 2021
⏱️ 12 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.
For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.
Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, I'm Amber Athe, the Spectator's Washington Editor, and I'm here to encourage you to subscribe to the Spectator's American Edition. |
| 0:09.2 | If you visit spectator. us forward slash subscribe, you can get our print and digital edition for just $7.99 a month. |
| 0:18.1 | This means you get unlimited access to our amazing website and will send you a beautiful |
| 0:23.5 | 80-page monthly magazine. You'll also have access to our mobile app. Subscribe now at |
| 0:29.2 | spectator.us forward slash subscribe. You won't regret it. |
| 0:47.9 | Hello and welcome to the Americano podcast, a series of discussions about American politics and now the Joe Biden presidency. |
| 1:02.0 | We will be looking at how a 78-year-old president will change America and we'll be asking if normalcy, which is what he promised to bring, has returned to American politics. |
| 1:04.1 | The answer, of course, is no. |
| 1:11.1 | I'm joined today by John Fund, who is a columnist at National Review and foxnews.com, And we're going to be asking if HR1 is an existential threat to American democracy. |
| 1:17.6 | John, you've written a couple of pieces for us on this subject. |
| 1:21.0 | HR1 is House Resolution 1, which is the Democrats' extremely ambitious plan to reform electoral processes in America in a way that |
| 1:31.9 | would massively advantage them in the future. Can you, for our listeners who might not know about it, |
| 1:38.3 | can you give us a sort of brief outline of what the reform is, how extensive it is, and why you |
| 1:43.5 | think it may be so dangerous? |
| 1:45.7 | Well, reform, as you know, Freddie, is a word that is often misused to describe what you want to do |
| 1:51.9 | and how you want to do it. I would call this a deform. I don't think there is anything in this |
| 1:57.9 | legislation that improves American democracy, perhaps except for a few passages on the margins. |
| 2:04.3 | This would basically make fraud easier by forcing every state, which currently has its own election laws, as the Constitution allows, |
| 2:13.3 | to implement early voting, automatic voter registration, same-day registration, online voter registration, |
| 2:19.5 | and no-fault absentee balloting. Without any guarantees that there would be safeguards against |
| 2:25.4 | fraud or misrepresentation, it would degrade the accuracy of registration lists by requiring states |
| 2:32.4 | to automatically register any person on any |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

