Hello and welcome back to Sociology 101.

Yes, we're going to deal with our favorite interlocutor, the anti-provisionist, Dr. James White.

Because recently, there was somewhat of a Twitter exchange for those who have not been following along or you know you have a life so you don't tell with stuff that's on Twitter. Let me just show you kind of what came up. Whitebeard there is referring to that that is Dr. White's handle, I guess, on Twitter.

And he had blocked me for some time and recently unblocked me.

And I am thankful for that.

That way I can actually engage with times that he brings critique to our perspective.

And so I had posted this, to show partiality and judgment is not good,

which is a quote from Proverbs 24, 23.

And then I just ask a simple question.

Okay. Please explain how predetermining one twin to go to hell and the other to go to heaven before they do anything good or bad.

Now, that's an important point there, before they do anything good or bad.

So they haven't sinned yet.

They haven't believed in Christ.

They haven't sinned yet.

They haven't done any of those things. It's before the foundation of the world, according to the Calvinistic interpretation of Ephesians chapter one, which we don't agree with their

interpretation, but according to their interpretation, the unconditional election happens before the

foundation of the world. So this is a choice being made before the fall, before the foundation

of the world, before the twins had done anything good or bad.

How is Calvinism's interpretation applied here?

How is that not showing partiality in judgment?

In other words, explain to me how that's not partiality in judgment.

And you're going to hear James White attempt to answer that question without answering that question. At least that's my charge.

...