meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

​Is Diddy Really Going To Sue Netflix For ONE BILLION DOLLARS!?! The TRUTH Exposed!

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

True Crime, News, News Commentary

3791 Ratings

🗓️ 15 December 2025

⏱️ 21 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Before the Netflix documentary Sean Combs: The Reckoning even aired, Diddy’s legal team fired off a cease-and-desist letter. They called the documentary a “shameful hit piece,” claimed the footage was “stolen,” and floated the idea of a billion-dollar lawsuit. And yet… nothing. No lawsuit. No emergency injunction. No filings.

So what is actually happening here?

In this segment, defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the legal truth behind Diddy’s threats. We examine what it would take for Diddy to win a copyright claim over footage filmed by his own videographer — especially when some reports say there were no formal contracts at all. Eric explains how ownership works, how intellectual property law overlaps with employment agreements, and why “stolen footage” is much harder to prove than people realize.

We then dig into defamation. Diddy is a public figure — which means the “actual malice” standard applies. Eric walks us through how extraordinarily difficult it is for celebrities to win defamation cases, especially when a documentary includes on-camera statements from people like Kirk Burrowes rather than direct factual claims made by Netflix.

We also discuss Diddy’s active lawsuit against NBCUniversal, how his own sentencing-day statements may have severely weakened his claims, and whether 50 Cent — a vocal adversary — exposes himself to additional liability as an executive producer.

Finally, we break down how New York’s anti-SLAPP laws could turn the tables entirely, forcing Diddy to pay Netflix’s legal fees if a defamation claim is deemed retaliatory.

This is where legal threats meet actual law — and those two worlds rarely look the same.

#DiddyCase #NetflixDoc #EricFaddis #LegalAnalysis #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #SeanCombs #DefamationLaw #TrueCrimePodcast #50Cent


Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872


Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Bruske, Stacey Cole, and Todd Michaels.

0:09.5

Diddy's team has called the 50 Cent documentary a shameful hit piece before it even aired.

0:16.0

They sent Netflix a cease and desist letter the day before the documentary dropped,

0:19.9

claimed the footage was stolen

0:22.7

and accused the streamer of handing creative control to a longtime adversary with a personal

0:29.4

vendetta. Yeah, they did it, and it made for great television.

0:33.7

They've threatened legal action. They've floated rumors of a billion-dollar lawsuit.

0:38.2

And yet, since a documentary premiered on Netflix to 22 million viewers,

0:43.8

Diddy hasn't actually filed anything against Netflix.

0:46.4

He did, however.

0:47.5

Sue NBC Universal for 100 million over a different documentary.

0:50.9

And that case is now hanging by a thread after his own courtroom

0:55.1

statements potentially torpedoed his defamation claims so what's the actual legal

1:01.1

exposure here does diddy have grounds does netflix and what about fitty personally joining us to

1:07.5

discuss eric fattis defense attorney former prosecutor thank you for joining us uh did Eric Fattis, defense attorney, former prosecutor, thank you for joining

1:12.4

us. Diddy's team has called the footage and the documentary stolen, but Netflix and the

1:18.9

directors say it was obtained legally from a legal standpoint. What would Diddy actually have to

1:26.2

prove to pursue a copyright or misappropriation

1:30.1

claim over footage that was filmed by his own videographer? Yeah, Tony, there are a few legal

1:37.6

wrinkles to this one. So did he would have to show that he had rights to that video, that he had

1:43.6

contracted with this videographer. and it's going to be

1:46.9

important to look at what that contract might say if there is a written one. And then on top of that,

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 26 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.